Submitted by MINE_exchange t3_126lfjd in Futurology
ThrillShow t1_jebdn9g wrote
Reply to comment by Space_Pirate_R in Google Accused of Using ChatGPT Algorithms in Creating Its Neural Network by MINE_exchange
I'm shocked by how many people unquestioningly accept the idea that AI should be entitled to the same rights as humans, as if a machine that scrapes huge portions of the internet for content is exactly the same as one person browsing.
NLwino t1_jeblcee wrote
What do you think search engines need to do to give you the results?
Space_Pirate_R t1_jebrw1m wrote
People making copyright work available on the internet are granting an implied permission for search engines to index their work, because that's pursuant to the normal purposes of posting on the internet. People make work available on the internet for the purpose of allowing others to find it using search engines and view it using browsers.
However, making copyright work available on the internet does not constitute an implied permission or license to do literally anything with the posted work. People don't usually post work on the internet for the purpose of helping corporations train commercial AIs, and therefore no implied permission to do so is granted by the act of making copyright work available on the internet.
[deleted] t1_jebr73q wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments