Fantastic-Climate-84 t1_it5554g wrote
Reply to comment by ItsAConspiracy in The End of Moore’s Law: Silicon computer chips are nearing the limit of their processing capacity. But is this necessarily an issue? Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies by CPHfuturesstudies
The point was that, even with pistons, adding more doesn’t mean better performance.
It’s no doubt you don’t see a difference when you’re still using tech that’s almost a decade old. Try keeping up, and you’ll notice a difference.
That said, crazy that your MacBook and phone are still working and able to be used, hey? Sure is rough for the consumer these days. Couldn’t use a ten year old computer back in 2008, let alone a phone.
Bleeding edge cuts both ways. Ai, drones, tablets replacing laptops, laptops replacing desktops, phones being the bulk of where we compute, but you’re still complaining.
ItsAConspiracy t1_it5ejgn wrote
Sure there's a difference. But in terms of sheer compute it's still just 3.5% annually, according to OP's article. That's not Moore's Law. Tech progress continues but Moore's Law is still dead until we get a whole new chip tech. It's not complaining to just recognize reality.
Fantastic-Climate-84 t1_it5hnx2 wrote
https://reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/y91xtu/_/it44stu/?context=1
You’re just not worth talking to.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments