Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Fonky_Fesh t1_ixlcdn4 wrote

Not just split by nations - search engines and social media, news media too - and while there isn't much evidence of traffic manipulation, companies like cloudflare wield a disproportionate amount of power over internet communications. That's not to say that there are dangerous places on the internet that people need to be protected from, but the idea of a totally neutral and open internet has long since been a thing of the past.

16

dyskinet1c t1_ixmj7vn wrote

Also, the power of the big cloud hosting providers is already being looked at as a systemic risk for financial institutions.

In the UK, banks are required to report their use of cloud services to the financial regulators because of the risk a major outage could pose.

2

RanCestor t1_ixpeodv wrote

They do it in Finland and it's governmental. Not kidding you. Our bureau of traffic control decided to take on the internet lol.

1

CPHfuturesstudies OP t1_ixl84wv wrote

Submission Statement: In many ways, the borderless nature of the internet is essential to its functioning as a global communications channel. The fact that a hypertext link can point to anything that exists anywhere in cyberspace is something that has long been taken for granted. Yet, in other ways, the open and unrestricted internet is more of an illusion than reality. On multiple levels, the net is fragmenting into separate domains that are no longer able or willing to connect. This fragmentation – sometimes referred to as the ‘Splinternet’– is happening along geopolitical lines, pointing to a potential future where ‘global connectivity’ is not so global anymore, but separated by digital iron curtains set up by rivalling great powers – with the US, the EU, China, and Russia being the primary actors.

This article was first published in FARSIGHT - Futures Reviewed. A quarterly futures publication by Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies.

9

CarelessHisser t1_ixlcvcd wrote

There are a LOT of websites blocked in the US. Doing a deepdive after finding some illegal content lead me down some shady fking places, but there are hundreds upon hundreds of websites buried in the world wide web.

Weird niche fked up forums, sales groups, services all that jazz. Not dark web, not deep web, none of that. Ne'er an onion in site.

It's wild. And the thing is that a lot of these websites are almost nomadic. Everytime one gets brought down, it pops up somewhere else, same content archived.

6

MycroFeline t1_ixldttf wrote

I misread it as “sphincternet”, but that may stil turn out to be the case…

4

AcademicGuest t1_ixl864b wrote

Yea it’s important this doesn’t become a thing cause then controllers can target individuals and shove them into places they don’t belong…

2

FuzzyChannel00 t1_ixle71o wrote

Anybody notice how now when you do a google search clicking see more at the bottom usually just brings up the same repeated links. Or how at the top it says millions of results but click page 9 at the bottom and there is def not millions. It ends at page 9 and again those pages are usually just copies of the links from page one. Idk if this has relevance with this topic but it def feels as if it does somehow

2

FuturologyBot t1_ixlarh4 wrote

The following submission statement was provided by /u/CPHfuturesstudies:


Submission Statement: In many ways, the borderless nature of the internet is essential to its functioning as a global communications channel. The fact that a hypertext link can point to anything that exists anywhere in cyberspace is something that has long been taken for granted. Yet, in other ways, the open and unrestricted internet is more of an illusion than reality. On multiple levels, the net is fragmenting into separate domains that are no longer able or willing to connect. This fragmentation – sometimes referred to as the ‘Splinternet’– is happening along geopolitical lines, pointing to a potential future where ‘global connectivity’ is not so global anymore, but separated by digital iron curtains set up by rivalling great powers – with the US, the EU, China, and Russia being the primary actors.

This article was first published in FARSIGHT - Futures Reviewed. A quarterly futures publication by Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies.


Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/z3dilx/is_the_unrestricted_internet_an_illusion_welcome/ixl84wv/

1

RanCestor t1_ixpej99 wrote

Yes. Truthfully net neutrality is dead. They even have an old word for it. Net-neutrality.

1

OliverSparrow t1_ixygse3 wrote

Web site won't scroll. Useless. Somewhat misses the point that "the Internet" is in fact two Internets: the C2C/C2B one and the larger B2B affair. Much of the B2B has dedicated connections and is isolated from tiny fingers.

1