Submitted by spyser t3_10kzpb8 in Futurology
Chad_Abraxas t1_j5x9cyg wrote
Reply to comment by fedfan4life in AI art made me appreciate human art more by spyser
As I've already said many times on this sub: brains and minds are not the same thing. Psychologists and psychiatrists (and biologists) don't even know what consciousness is or where it resides. It's clearly related to the brain in some way, yet it is also not the brain. Or not just the brain.
You can talk about brains all you want. But what we're discussing when we talk about emotions and experiences and being human is the mind--the consciousness--not the brain.
I happen to be in the "AI can attain consciousness and may already be conscious" camp. But even then, that's AI consciousness, and there is no rational reason to believe that AI consciousness would bear anything but a superficial resemblance to human consciousness, any more than we might assume a dog's consciousness or a whale's consciousness or a fungus's consciousness bears anything more than a superficial resemblance to human consciousness.
fedfan4life t1_j5xbjdq wrote
I fail to see how any of that is relevant to AI producing art. An AI could have zero consciousness and still be programmed to know how human brains would respond to certain imagery. Can you give me one example of some piece of art that would be impossible for an AI to produce?
buddhaconfiguration t1_j5y4o0t wrote
A physical one
[deleted] t1_j5yqszd wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments