Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

kelev11en OP t1_j6x2llp wrote

Submission statement: New reporting finds that it's not just that CNET let an AI publish news articles that were later shown to be substantially fabricated and plagiarized. It's actually a lot worse -- at internal meetings before they deployed the AI, leadership acknowledged the factual errors and plagiarism, but ultimately chose to deploy the AI anyway. In the end, more than 50 percent of its articles required significant corrections for factual mistakes and plagiarism.

9

r1chard3 t1_j70enxt wrote

Fun fact: AIs are lazy and will lie to avoid work.

3

pinkfootthegoose t1_j6xr5vx wrote

how does this compare to non AI written articles?

1

kelev11en OP t1_j6xsrc0 wrote

No credible news organization is issuing corrections on half the material it publishes

11

rogert2 t1_j6y6eng wrote

I was honestly not aware that CNET was considered a "credible news organization."

This just... wow.

0

rogert2 t1_j6y6s82 wrote

> CNET didn't respond to a request for comment about the new allegations.

It's really too bad they didn't let the AI respond on their behalf.

6

BuddhaBizZ t1_j70jp7o wrote

Companies that have no consequences don’t care?!? Color me surprised!

2

FuturologyBot t1_j6x7txb wrote

The following submission statement was provided by /u/kelev11en:


Submission statement: New reporting finds that it's not just that CNET let an AI publish news articles that were later shown to be substantially fabricated and plagiarized. It's actually a lot worse -- at internal meetings before they deployed the AI, leadership acknowledged the factual errors and plagiarism, but ultimately chose to deploy the AI anyway. In the end, more than 50 percent of its articles required significant corrections for factual mistakes and plagiarism.


Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/10rrc4l/red_ventures_knew_its_ai_lied_and_plagiarized/j6x2llp/

1