Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JFKRFKSRVLBJ t1_j296bod wrote

Do you think Andrew Tate would be offended if we called him a “scoundrel” and a “man of loose ethics”? Of course not, he already knows that!

To deal with a troglodyte you have to hit him where it hurts! His pee-pee size!

The body-shaming is the most superficial aspect of this whole controversy.

4

ChocolateCavatappi t1_j298706 wrote

If you want to body shame someone out of malice with the intent to cause emotional distress, that's your prerogative.

0

JFKRFKSRVLBJ t1_j29a4pi wrote

I’m not too concerned about the feelings of a con-artist and abuser of women.Sorry!

3

ChocolateCavatappi t1_j29cdt5 wrote

However you want to justify it, is up to you.

0

JFKRFKSRVLBJ t1_j29dxfa wrote

In the big picture, the pee-pee jokes are pretty trivial.

A scumbag got put in his place. The dick jokes are the most superficial aspect of this whole thing.

3

ChocolateCavatappi t1_j29j5d2 wrote

Its alright if you feel that way.

0

Evening-Tomatillo-47 t1_j29wbb6 wrote

Dude have you got a AAA size dick? Why are you so offended by this? Do you think he's going to read this and feel shame? Or he's going to get us all except for you because you defended him?

2