Comments
AbigailFlippinfloppn t1_j07wh35 wrote
Lol you should see China
Proof-Variation7005 t1_j07y6l2 wrote
It's a bit disingenuous to say the same amount of time. The South Coast rail project had 10+ years of planning before breaking ground over 20 years before the groundbreaking occurred for this station.
It's dumb that it took a relatively simple idea 15+ years to go from "hey, what about this" to being something with tangible progress.
ToadScoper OP t1_j0801cb wrote
The restoration of passenger service on the P&W mainline has been considered many times, but unfortunately has never developed into anything substantial. I think RIDOT is studying the corridor yet again atm but I doubt it'll go anywhere
ToadScoper OP t1_j080ia4 wrote
Unfortunately, that's the nature of most rail projects in the US, where unsustainable highway infrastructure is prioritized while passenger rail is given the short end of the stick...
Cycledrome t1_j0856cb wrote
Fantastic news. Pawtucket’s on the come up.
gravytrain2112 t1_j08nwup wrote
Let’s hope it can be maintained properly. The south Attleboro station had a new rust hole in the working stairs every week. I’ve seen better railway stations in the ex-Soviet Union.
KennyWuKanYuen t1_j08wsws wrote
Really? It’s one of the better ones IMO since everyone is flying around 70-80, with some hitting 90+. 295 is also a good one too, except the occasional speed traps.
FAYCSB t1_j0937uq wrote
How is Mass doing with the South Attleboro train station?
ToadScoper OP t1_j093rhw wrote
South Attleboro was a death trap, it was a built during the cookie-cutter era of MBTA stations during the 1970s-1980s
ToadScoper OP t1_j093xdu wrote
Many studies have been conducted, some of which suggested extending the Franklin line through Milford to Woonsocket. There’s definitely a rider base in that area, but much of the trackage would need to be rebuilt for passenger services
i_nobes_what_i_nobes t1_j099l1b wrote
Oh I wonder if it’s going to be used as often as the train station that they built in North Kingstown…
ToadScoper OP t1_j099t17 wrote
It should be utilized much better than wickford junction, the station is in a much denser area and isn’t as overbuilt
i_nobes_what_i_nobes t1_j099zh2 wrote
Are we talking about the same station? I think I referred to Wickford as North Kingstown, but it’s that big one on 10 Rod Rd (102), i’ve never seen anybody there, I’ve never even seen a car in the parking lot. It was an insane waste of space
ToadScoper OP t1_j09afuu wrote
The one your referring to is wickford junction, one of the biggest white elephants in recent Rhode Island history. Wickford junction cemented the failure of the south county commuter rail project, mainly due to inadequate transit planning…
ToadScoper OP t1_j09b1ph wrote
The station will be greatly beneficial, however, a lot more has to be done with regional “last mile” connections… that’s what will matter most in the end
[deleted] t1_j09gi6i wrote
[deleted]
Bad_Karma21 t1_j09gw52 wrote
OP transits.
ToadScoper OP t1_j09lz31 wrote
Unfortunately, the MBTA has a lackluster history of designating temporary station platforms during reconstructions… I doubt it will happen for south Attleboro
xanderg102301 t1_j09swbz wrote
Yeah, no it's not
TheSausageFattener t1_j0bfix9 wrote
From what Ive read they opted to build an entirely new, modern station at South Attleboro rather than do a patch repair on the catwalk. Id imagine Pawtucket C/F is part of the reason because many of the homes closest to SA are in RI.
TheSausageFattener t1_j0bfpzp wrote
It and TF Green are just miserable stations.
FAYCSB t1_j0bjemh wrote
The issue is moe how long they left the station in disrepair. The stairs on either side of the tracks were “temporarily closed” for at least 8 years. Interesting that the whole thing was only deemed unsafe once the station wasn’t really needed anymore, due to the pandemic.
Does Pawtucket/CF have parking?
TheSausageFattener t1_j0bm599 wrote
Quite a bit, but not nearly as much as SA since that thing is a glorified parking lot.
gravytrain2112 t1_j0cj4ab wrote
That was one of the plans, however that station was never allocated funding through their capital plan. Yes they could have used overpass as it was mentioned in one of their meetings, however it wouldn’t have been fiscally feasible to do that and be able to accommodate handicapped access.
frenetix t1_j0cjjlb wrote
The Moscow subway system has some beautiful architecture.
htzer t1_j0co47f wrote
RI does have that one light rail line (or maybe BRT) in a proposed future transit plan… but it’s running in the same direction as the NEC so it seems a tad redundant, no?
Would an East-west running line make a bit more sense? (maybe utilize the old tunnel under college hill), and take a load off of i195 and Douglass/ smith street
We will get a bike trail over the new red bridge, as with many new RIDOT projects so that’s a good step at least.
ToadScoper OP t1_j0cup0w wrote
Agreed, SA station was always quite atrocious but did serve a rider base. Hopefully when it’s rebuilt they could zone some of the area around it for denser mixed-used developments so that it’s not purely a antiquated park and ride
ToadScoper OP t1_j0cvhvu wrote
The light rail line is actually proposed to run between central falls and Olneyville along a dedicated ROW. That being said, I doubt it will ever happen since RIDOT’s priorities are entirely bus centric and they refuse to do anything else. Providence could greatly benefit from an LRT if it is done properly, it’s kind of ridiculous that RI doesn’t have any other form of rail transit beyond the NEC
ToadScoper OP t1_j07tpxo wrote
Personally, I think it's absolutely crazy that within the same amount of time it took RIDOT to build a single station, MassDOT has constructed most of South Coast Rail which includes miles of new track and six new stations...