Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Showerthoughts_Mod t1_j9zs1hv wrote

This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.

Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"

(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)

Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.

1

nico87ca t1_j9zwu5g wrote

There's a possibility I've created a machine to see the future, but my contract stipulated I had to wipe my memory for the patent.

But knowing how terrible this machine was, i added a failsafe in the PCB that would make it fail. I also left myself a bunch of clues to figure it out.

1

BenjaminaAU t1_ja03sk5 wrote

There's a possibility the King of England is a shapeshifting reptile. Doesn't make it probable.

1

king_of_england_bot t1_ja03tpq wrote

>King of England

Did you mean the King of the United Kingdom, the King of Canada, the King of Australia, etc?

The last King of England was William III whose successor Anne, with the 1707 Acts of Union, dissolved the title of Queen/King of England.

####FAQ

Isn't King Charles III still also the King of England?

This is only as correct as calling him the King of London or King of Hull; he is the King of the place that these places are in, but the title doesn't exist.

Is this bot monarchist?

No, just pedantic.

I am a bot and this action was performed automatically.

3