Submitted by number1dork t3_120rixo in askscience
PopularStaff7146 t1_jdjaz48 wrote
Variants kind of fade out. From an evolutionary perspective, a virus’s entire purpose is to live and replicate within it’s hosts. That’s why we’ve generally observed later variants of some viruses to be less fatal. It doesn’t do a virus much good to kill its host.
Booty_Bumping t1_jdjpvzt wrote
> That’s why we’ve generally observed later variants of some viruses to be less fatal. It doesn’t do a virus much good to kill its host.
While this is somewhat true, there are important limitations to this model. If a virus has already done enough spreading, from an evolutionary perspective it doesn't matter much if the patient dies later. Another factor, observed in Delta variant, is that having a respiratory virus that is more contagious might also mean it is more deadly, because it is disrupting more cells to produce more viruses.
melanthius t1_jdjfjti wrote
Wouldn’t a virus do just fine if it re-infects a few people on average before the host dies?
barchueetadonai t1_jdjg7dd wrote
Yes, but it’s very difficult to be infected with two very similar virus stains at the same time, so a more infectious variant (like Omicron) would get to most hosts first, so the other strains would keep hitting hosts that are already infected with the more infectious strain.
valryuu t1_jdjie0x wrote
So does the more infectious strain just basically outcompete the less infectious ones, and prevent the latter from even actually infecting the person?
[deleted] t1_jdjgiq3 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments