Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

50calPeephole t1_iu090uq wrote

Doesn't look like a legitimate construction barrier at all.

7

HammerfestNORD OP t1_iu0adsq wrote

No. I didn't think so. Was playing devil's advocate to try an avoid complaints about blaming homeless.

−7

77bobcat t1_iu16wq9 wrote

That Dirty Mike and the boys new f-shack

4

riski_click t1_iu0j9as wrote

That's the guy that used to sleep under the footbridge on the other side of the street.

1

IamUnamused t1_iu0berj wrote

it's an unhoused person's shelter. Been working on it for a few months now

​

EDIT: why did this get downvoted? It's just facts folks

−3

HammerfestNORD OP t1_iu0jh7u wrote

I'm surprised it's been allowed in that spot. Sorry, but, I'd think it should be considered a threat to the Red Line.

I'm not sure how any "unhoused" could be allowed to set up under important public transportation structures.

−6

Snoo_97625 t1_iu0kpbz wrote

Funny, it doesn't look like it's on the tracks. Guess I just don't know the red line very well

3