Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

N3XT191 OP t1_itl3ycb wrote

EDIT: “Historical” (4th genre) is Historical Fiction! “History” (7th) is non-fiction!

Data: My own shelves, exported from my own app (https://shelf.li, you can explore the data by clicking "Try the demo")

Tools: Matplotlib

Genres: Assigned manually, sometimes obviously debatable...

Books over 1100 pages:

  • Oathbringer (Brandon Sanderson): 1331
  • The Stand (Stephen King): 1325
  • The Count of Monte Cristo: 1312
  • Die Arena (Stephen King, German): 1279
  • The Power Broker (Robert A. Caro): 1246
  • World without End (Ken Follett): 1240
  • Rhythm of War (Brandon Sanderson): 1230
  • Master of the Senate (Robert A. Caro): 1200
  • Memories of Ice (Steven Erikson): 1180
  • Edge of Eternity (Ken Follett) 1158
6

draypresct t1_itl53tp wrote

Nice! Interesting to see the range of fantasy novel lengths.

I wonder how many of the pages in the historical books come from the reference section.

14

dongorras t1_itl560a wrote

Is the page count somehow normalized? Due to different page and font sizes. Although maybe I'm just ruining the fun of a harmless hobby measurement

1

N3XT191 OP t1_itl5fgm wrote

Yeah, most fantasy books are in the 400-700 range but at the lower end I’ve got a couple novellas and at the upper end I’ve got Sanderson, Tad Williams and Steven Erikson 😅

The “Historical” section is actual “Historical Fiction” (bad label I just realized), so no reference. The “History” genre is probably about 15% references on average.

8

N3XT191 OP t1_itl5ktz wrote

Nope, not normalized. There’s definitely quite some range in word count / page, I know that The Power Broker is about 15% longer (by word count) than Oathbringer but it has 100 fewer pages.

Especially the very short novellas have sometimes only half (or even fewer) as many words/page.

Sadly word count data is not nicely available…

4

stone_chestnut t1_itlc1x6 wrote

That's good ! I think you could go even further with some statistic tests, like ANOVA for instance. It can give you some accurate indications to test relations between book genres.

2

N3XT191 OP t1_itlf3jp wrote

That would be interesting, but the data is inherently biased by my selection and only 3 genres have enough numbers for conclusions anyway.

So actual conclusions would be very hard to make!

3

PFhelpmePlan t1_itm9006 wrote

Any chance you could share your code for doing the boxplots with the individual data points included like that?

1

N3XT191 OP t1_itmy5xb wrote

Ideally they’d be evenly distributed so the width of the point cloud represents the density (like in a violin plot), but that was too annoying to implement. Maybe next time!

1

RestlessAmbivert t1_itnqolk wrote

You can get those Fantasy numbers way up if you get into The Wheel of Time, lot of chonkers in there. Sanderson did a great job of helping to finish the series off.

2

mimprocesstech t1_ito573b wrote

You need more books. I hear 30 is the minimum for a statistically relevant sample size lol.

2

holdenontoyoubooks t1_itpftyx wrote

A few comments:

​

I really like this idea especially for books owned, rather than read, just because it removes any timeline, or expectation of "reading more books is good". This is a really cool idea.

​

I wish I had done this before I purged most of my books (except ones that I like to display)

​

The outliers are fun, because it makes sense that longer books end up getting collected.

What is the low outlier in Science?

1