Submitted by madredditscientist t3_ymn7rs in dataisbeautiful
Alexstarfire t1_iv4rn5q wrote
Only 20% are from earcups wearing out? We talking the padding? Because that fails first on every single pair I've ever owned.
HW90 t1_iv4uoyi wrote
If it includes earbuds then earcups wearing out will be automatically disadvantaged. It's also possible to continue using headphones with worn out earcups, whilst it's not possible with a broken cable, so the latter category is more likely to be considered a fail.
Cable or port damage is a notorious source of failure amongst many products, e.g. charging port failure is one of the leading causes of getting rid of phones.
Rhenic t1_iv56ykh wrote
It's also trivially easy to just replace the padding; Bought some $2 replacements that made my previous headphones last another 3 years.
FuriousWillis t1_iv510rs wrote
Likewise battery failure is at a disadvantage due to any headphones that plug in
Daniel-Plainview96 t1_iv4rw7x wrote
I think you just rock out too hard
Amthala t1_iv5e5yi wrote
No shot, it's always cables that die first.
muftu t1_iv6aeax wrote
I treat it as a consumable. I tried going with some knock offs but I couldn’t even fit them. So I am stuck with buying new bose earcups every 10 months or so.
kelkokelko t1_iv66ddm wrote
Me too but that's not usually why I stop using them
imafraidofmuricans t1_iv6mv5t wrote
But that's also easily replaced in many cases, so people probably won't bother reporting it as "failed"
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments