Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

shouldco t1_j6kyodk wrote

Well for one we (should) care about non humans too. At the very least we know affecting large ecosystems also brings negative consequences to areas outside of those ecosystems.

But also it's expensive. Nobody wants to pay to haul trash to the middle of Nevada.

7

[deleted] t1_j6kz5r0 wrote

[removed]

4

explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_j6l1os4 wrote

Please read this entire message

Your comment has been removed for the following reason(s):

  • Top level comments (i.e. comments that are direct replies to the main thread) are reserved for explanations to the OP or follow up on topic questions (Rule 3).

Plagiarism is a serious offense, and is not allowed on ELI5. Although copy/pasted material and quotations are allowed as part of explanations, you are required to include the source of the material in your comment. Comments must also include at least some original explanation or summary of the material; comments that are only quoted material are not allowed.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe it was removed erroneously, explain why using this form and we will review your submission.

1

Mammoth-Mud-9609 t1_j6kzl62 wrote

Transport costs would be a major factor, in addition deserts aren't empty they have ecosystems which are fairly vulnerable to changes.

2

explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_j6l0k1n wrote

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

  • Rule #2 - Questions must seek objective explanations

  • Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts (Rule 2).

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1