Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Hydroblitz3307 t1_j6juboz wrote

They don’t really know, thats why some food spoils faster than the date. They just know how long the food has until its freshness or “perfect flavor” is left until its not in a sellable quality

1

stephanepare t1_j6juhdm wrote

The "best before" date is actualy a "tastes optimal if opened before". It's a guestimate, based on experiments. It has nothing to do with food spoiling, so they can afford to approximate.

Usually, there are some tests before launching some new product line with different sealed containers sitting there for different amounts of time at room temperature or fridges. For dates a year or more away, they guess using science. Petri dish cultures, for example, can help them extrapolate future dates just by watching the bacteria growth rate.

7

ro6in t1_j6k9t7c wrote

A relative of mine used to work in the field of frozen food. They conducted a "crash test": If you defrost and re-freeze food several times, this mimics "decay" in a quicker way. From those results, they could figure out shelf life (without actually having to wait e.g. 27 months).

3

johndoe30x1 t1_j6l8uqi wrote

It is completely unregulated except for infant food and formula. That said, companies tend to err on the side of caution as it’s better for business for customers to throw out products that might still be edible as opposed to facing lawsuits over spoiled food.

3

Gigantic_Idiot t1_j6lfmiu wrote

On the flip side, there's heated chambers that do the same thing. There are some companies that will legit evaluate their product every week/month during development until is no longer meets quality or safety specs.

2

stephanepare t1_j6lki92 wrote

That's half the reason. The other reason is for marketing purposes. This way, you guarantee taste, not edibility. You get less complaints that your stuff doesn't taste good, as people know they're past the "best before" date.

1