myth2988 t1_izfe7av wrote
Reply to comment by Kronoxdund in EU sets December 28th, 2024, deadline for all new phones to use USB-C for wired charging by speckz
I mean There is always the option not to buy a new iPhone, but you know people and priorities
King_madness1 t1_izgey9k wrote
Imagine blaming the consumer. The solution here is regulating the giant corporation.
r2k-in-the-vortex t1_izhvi47 wrote
That's what the consumer does with their choices. Buy a overpriced gadget locked in a walled garden - you get gadgets that are even more overpriced and locked down even harder. Apple is shit, never bought anything from them, I don't think I ever will unless their entire business strategy does a 180.
King_madness1 t1_izhyqq5 wrote
That’s a valid reason to not buy Apple. Blaming the consumer feels like excusing Apple though.
We need to stop thinking “Apple fans vs Android fans” because it’s really more like “big companies vs all of us” :)
daveh30 t1_izhob79 wrote
The solution should have been to spell out the problem and give industry a deadline to solve it. “No more proprietary ports… go.” Government trying to dole out the solution is awful. Someday soon there is going to be a superior successor to USB C that no one will be able to use while they fight with the EU to go back and change shortsighted legislation that specified a standard that’s already about 7 years old…
King_madness1 t1_izhp4fn wrote
This regulation is doing exactly that: spelling out the problem and giving the industry a deadline to solve it. That’s what this post is about.
Not sure why people think the government is incapable of simply allowing companies to follow the latest USB consortium standard in 5-10 years.
The pushback here feels oddly corporate.
Edit: USB is literally the open standard that companies agree upon. Check out the list of companies who decide USB design.
daveh30 t1_izhqo64 wrote
They absolutely did not state the problem and give it to industry to solve. They legislated a solution. 2 very different things.
r2k-in-the-vortex t1_izhvqoh wrote
Wrong, EU for years told manufacturers to standardise chargers. The rest did, apple did not. So eventually EU wrote into law what the rest of the industry standardised to and apple specifically can go suck it.
King_madness1 t1_izhsxpz wrote
USB is literally the companies deciding “here’s the best port that everyone can and should use”, and they’ve been constantly updating it (see USB 4).
The companies chose USB-C, they made it, but since Apple ignored it for profits, the govt decided to enforce it.
Are you rooting for Apple? I’m honestly quite confused about your angle here.
AberrantRambler t1_izja5fx wrote
That’s like saying our current government is the best government as everyone voted on it so we all agree it’s the best. It really glosses over a lot of things.
King_madness1 t1_izjccjy wrote
I did not say that.
USB was created for this purpose: standardization.
It all comes down to whether you want a universal port, or if you’re too busy drinking Apple’s anti-consumer koolaid ;)
AberrantRambler t1_izjcql7 wrote
I know you didn’t say that - do you know what an analogy is?
A port designed by committed isn’t going to be the best port for all things - it’s just a standard.
You definitely said it was the best - and it’s most definitely not unless you’re explicitly defining exactly what it’s best for (as there’s plenty of ports/cables that are better for different purposes, or else every single cable you’d use in your life would be the same - ever use a power cord for a desktop PC? Or an Ethernet cable?)
King_madness1 t1_izjd3e3 wrote
Okay, which port would you like them to use instead?
Do you think companies want to use the port they’ve already invested years of R&D into, or be told to scratch it all and make a new one just for shits and giggles?
AberrantRambler t1_izjddll wrote
Whichever port they (the engineers familiar with the project) decide is the best port for the application.
If I feel they were able to competently design the rest of the product I see no reason to assume they cannot competently choose an appropriate port for the product.
King_madness1 t1_izjdluh wrote
Okay so we’re on the same page really. What I’m trying to say is that this design phase is already happening with Type-C and USB 4. This is what the engineers agree on.
AberrantRambler t1_izje6eo wrote
Mostly - my point of contention with your post was the use of “best” (which I feel is a really tricky word to actually use correctly without being very specific about for which purposes).
I also really have a hard time with people praising usb c/usb 4/thunderbolt as they made an absolute cluster fuck with them all being the same port and I don’t particularly find it to be anybody at the USB consortiums “best” work. And in terms of consumer confusion I’d call it some of their worst.
King_madness1 t1_izjenlh wrote
We’re in total agreement about the clusterfuck of naming schemes and feature support.
That said, there is no better port. USB 4 has the best display output, power delivery and data transfer rate capabilities.
This hypothetical “new best port” would literally just be USB 5, which hopefully is less confusing than USB 4 and will probably still use the Type-C cable.
AberrantRambler t1_izjfrwb wrote
I’m not as confident it would just be USB 5.
I could see Apple having made a better port in same way they made better SoCs. It’s not out of the realm of possibility they’ve been iterating on lightning Ike they were SoCs and just not releasing them (it’s incredibly unlikely, but not out of the realm of possibility).
Imagine it’s literally what would take until USB 6 or 7 in terms of features for the sake of argument.
In theory if apple must use the standard they’d be prevented from using this obviously better cable.
That’s a bad situation.
Similarly saying to all companies you must make all your innovations out in the open so that way governments don’t accidentally make your better product illegal to implement.
King_madness1 t1_izjtnak wrote
That’s where our viewpoints differ then: I’d rather have all the companies working together than creating their own proprietary stuff.
The “bad situation” in my opinion is when there are fractured proprietary solutions, it’s anti-consumer by design.
Unless you mean Apple (or any single company) creating an open standard all by themselves and sharing it for free, but then they have no reason to do it (no profit). More likely, they would share the burden of cost with other companies, which is essentially what USB is.
AberrantRambler t1_izju3pi wrote
I feel if we’re going to start abandoning some of the tenants of capitalism in favor of a socialistic approach it would behoove us to do it in a more thorough manner than just cell phone port charging regulation :/
King_madness1 t1_izjv1k9 wrote
It’s not socialism, technically. Consumers/governments don’t own USB and can’t contribute to it either, it’s just corporations.
You’re right, there are more important things than this (see right to repair) but I believe universal ports are a good pro-consumer step forward, whether it’s USB or if we start from scratch and call it something else :)
thecanadiansniper1-2 t1_izimbai wrote
Sorry but the USB Forum is formed by the industry.
throwawaygoodcoffee t1_izir2f3 wrote
You do know that the EU is only enforcing standardisation right? The type of connector these companies can use is determined by the companies themselves. The next time USB needs to update the physical connector they all come together on the same design rather than making multiple products to fix the same problem.
more_beans_mrtaggart t1_izfwmbi wrote
That would be awful. Seriously.
no_nao t1_izg2p6c wrote
This is a terrible take, like many other consumer blaming ones. Apple has a monopoly on its ecosystem, and oftentimes it’s not up to the individual consumer. That’s why we need a regulated market. Regulation is to blame here, or lack thereof.
TehOwn t1_izg3cp6 wrote
>Apple has a monopoly on its ecosystem, and oftentimes it’s not up to the individual consumer.
It's always up to the user to quit the ecosystem. It's how much you're willing to leave behind that is the problem.
But I agree, regulation is necessary because capitalism naturally favors exploitation and amorality.
r2k-in-the-vortex t1_izhw7y9 wrote
They like to pretend they are a monopoly, but they aren't. Desktop, laptop, tablet, phone, earphones, smartwatch, none of them have to be an iAnything. Products on rest of the market are more bang for buck and better products overall. Its the consumer fucking themselves over when they buy apple.
[deleted] t1_izhy8h3 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments