Submitted by Whole-Campaign89 t3_11txdsd in jerseycity
I know the sub is generally skeptical about such claims - especially the ridiculous assertion that JC rents are higher than NYC rents - but I think there could be a grain of truth to this story (despite being in a Murdoch rag).
With the NYC rental market so dementedly out of control, seems feasible that Hudson and Bergen are now more in demand than the city itself. It appears to check out based on all the newbies asking about DTJC rentals on a $1,500 budget.
https://nypost.com/2023/03/16/north-jersey-is-the-hottest-rental-market-in-the-us-study/
JeromePowellAdmirer t1_jclf56d wrote
They're more in demand in visible terms, but in economic terms demand is still higher in Manhattan. If Manhattan was as cheap as here, they'd be #1 on this metric by far.
As for the JC rents higher than NYC thing, no one ever brings up composition effects. Let's say you go from 2000 old units and 2000 new units to 2000 old units and 3000 new units with no changes in the rent of the actual units themselves. "Jersey City average rent" will still go up even though the exact same number of old units at the same price are still available.