Comments
EyesOnImprovement OP t1_jcpwiog wrote
It was a joke, you humorless papist.
nuncio_populi t1_jcpwucg wrote
Get better at telling jokes then, you witless prot.
AccountantOfFraud t1_jcr8bwb wrote
You're definitely the white people Osequera is talking about.
EyesOnImprovement OP t1_jcs5mu0 wrote
huh?
boneapetitty t1_jcp1qtk wrote
12 million that should probably go to fixing the roads around the future Pompidou…
shanes3t t1_jcr6uir wrote
Nah. I love driving by there feeling like I'm in a war-torn country where I pay $2k/ month in property taxes.
pchow16 t1_jct6l81 wrote
What the article actually says is that it's 36 million, 24 million in 2022 budget! You want to make journal square better let Kushner, and whoever else is building there, fund the museum. They are the ones getting the tax abatements. Not us! Put it on their backs not ours. They are the ones who will profit from the redevelopment!
EyesOnImprovement OP t1_jctfgqf wrote
And yet they still raid charity funds for their Paris trips.
nuncio_populi t1_jcpqshq wrote
Just so we can all skip the faux outrage because the title conflates two separate stories — What the article actually says is that the State of NJ also supports the Pompidou museum coming to Jersey City because they view it as an anchor in the redevelopment of Journal Square.
If you are concerned about who funded the mayor's trip, that's a very valid issue and should be discussed. But it deserves its own articles and threads.
There just isn't any need to stir up outrage over routine state funding for the arts that is unrelated to Fulop's jaunt to Paris.