Comments
World_Navel t1_j21katq wrote
Current market cap of DAVE is about $102.6 million. Take away $100 million of that and there won’t be enough left to stay listed.
Soft-Cryptographer-1 t1_j21kqlr wrote
Puts on DAVE
World_Navel t1_j21lhrk wrote
Not sure puts would pay off when the company gets de-listed tho?
pegothejerk t1_j21t6uh wrote
Dave’s not here man!
Moontoya t1_j2214kh wrote
I understand what you're trying to do Dave, I'm afraid I can't let you do that.
quequotion t1_j21tsqg wrote
I understood that reference.
[deleted] t1_j23wuko wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j241srg wrote
[removed]
Soft-Cryptographer-1 t1_j21p705 wrote
True that
cheepcheepimasheep t1_j24m89g wrote
On top of that, the break-even for every put on $DAVE is negative dollars. As in, you won't break even on a put unless the share price is < 0 dollars. Which is impossible. Don't buy puts.
cloud_coder OP t1_j21l4yn wrote
Good idea. might be too late. :-D
[deleted] t1_j22opnl wrote
[removed]
quequotion t1_j21olpi wrote
There must have been some point where SBF and his management team transitioned from running a mere ponzi scheme to thinking they had carte blanche to do whatever they wanted with the monopoly money they could create indefinitely.
For once, I actually want a docuseries about this. I understand people who had reasonable trust in this company lost dearly, but I think it would even make a great sitcom. This is hilarious. One of the companies was called "Dave"? Like, really? "Dave"?
Flatline2962 t1_j21rm03 wrote
Any documentary that doesn't go into the polycule thing they had going on is a failure in my book.
[deleted] t1_j21sicd wrote
[removed]
indoloks t1_j22uxij wrote
cna i get sum context pls, wtf?
RG_Kid t1_j23b97m wrote
Since nobody answered your question
Caroline, CEO of Alameda, tweeted about her regular use of amphetamines.
Source: https://nypost.com/2022/11/15/crypto-ceo-caroline-ellison-tweeted-about-regular-amphetamine-use/
Fushinaz t1_j23dbzm wrote
Sounds like something from /r/imverysmart
LiveLearnCoach t1_j23j0wh wrote
Isn’t Ritalin (ADHD medicine) low-level amphetamines?
FuzzyBacon t1_j23ow90 wrote
Ritalin is methylphenidate, but Adderall and Vyvanse are both forms of amphetamine.
LiveLearnCoach t1_j2du3xg wrote
Meh, six of one, half a dozen of the other.
WAIT! HOW MANY DID I TAKE?!!
(Your clarification is well received. I seem to have mixed up the meds)
yo2sense t1_j24r9b7 wrote
This is the LARPing woman of "sultry wood nymph" fame.
[deleted] t1_j243ber wrote
[removed]
cloud_coder OP t1_j24zce6 wrote
Yes! Polyamory Genius that she was for a moment last week in her own mind.
[deleted] t1_j24zyq7 wrote
[removed]
cloud_coder OP t1_j25vn67 wrote
Yep: to be fair they said "amphetamine" not "methamphetamine". We're splitting hairs now. The best quote of all is this one from Caroline (she tweeted this and it still up on twitter):
"nothing like regular amphetamine use to make you appreciate how dumb a lot of normal, non-medicated human experience is"
Here's the tweet: https://twitter.com/carolinecapital/status/1379036346300305408?lang=en
And some press coverage at the time
https://nypost.com/2022/11/15/crypto-ceo-caroline-ellison-tweeted-about-regular-amphetamine-use/
[deleted] t1_j25xh8l wrote
[removed]
cloud_coder OP t1_j25z3gs wrote
I loved it. I was not replying to you. Some dude said "But it was Aderall..." like that makes it better. Then he deleted his post.
[deleted] t1_j25z7dx wrote
[removed]
cloud_coder OP t1_j25z7t8 wrote
it was a Polyjoke :-)
[deleted] t1_j25zb8d wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j22expv wrote
[removed]
quequotion t1_j21rute wrote
Oh, we need it all. If it takes two seasons, so be it.
[deleted] t1_j23fpjx wrote
[removed]
joebalooka84 t1_j2395yz wrote
They better skip on the realism thing though and hire some beautiful Hollywood actresses or nobody will watch that.
PerfectPercentage69 t1_j23frk2 wrote
I would watch if it's Danny DeVitto as Caroline Ellison!
Moontoya t1_j22175v wrote
$3.50 says cocaine is involved in the decision making process
DonnieJuniorsEmails t1_j2412ur wrote
dammit, i gave my tree fiddy to that Loch Ness Monster
adarkmethodicrash t1_j244wid wrote
I believe amphetamines were the drug of choice.
dwilkes827 t1_j24lv34 wrote
remember the good ole days when cokeheads would just steal your CD deck out of your car instead of siphoning billions
[deleted] t1_j2254sb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j24bqc0 wrote
[deleted]
cloud_coder OP t1_j24zfka wrote
They acknowledged they were using meth. Google it.
[deleted] t1_j25s5ui wrote
[removed]
49thDipper t1_j23518v wrote
I recently watched the WeWork movie. It’s fucking crazy how after awhile these folks are fine with doing very wasteful and extravagant things with OPM. They lose all sense of what’s real. It’s worth a watch.
quequotion t1_j235m1i wrote
I fully expect that of this situation as well. Makes me wonder if we couldn't do a study to find the approximate dollars per unit of time income that stimulates one's god complex. Like, at precisely what amount of cash grab does the human brain give up conceiving that it could ever end?
ImNotAWhaleBiologist t1_j236tph wrote
I don’t know, but sign me up, throw money at me, and I’ll let you know when I feel like the golden god!
… I’m a cheap date, it’ll probably only take a few hundred bucks.
quequotion t1_j23t759 wrote
>$1000 lottery win
I AM MIDAS. ALL THAT I TOUCH IS GOLDEN.
49thDipper t1_j2374oc wrote
I’ve thought about this too. Like the stories about fairly normal people that hit it big in the lottery and then are destitute and living on the streets in less than two years. It’s tragic but it’s their money that they made horrible decisions with. But to do this with other peoples’ money just blows my mind. Bernie Madoff did it in the most coldly calculating way. But this guy and the WeWork couple spent other peoples’ money like it was normal to buy jets and mansions instead of paying the electric bill.
My girlfriend and I take turns buying each lottery tickets. It’s our inside joke that we want to see how the other would handle a big windfall.
SirMonkey687 t1_j221p22 wrote
Great show
beach_2_beach t1_j226aty wrote
Hello Dave
How can I help you?
quequotion t1_j233mlb wrote
I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
beach_2_beach t1_j233rn6 wrote
I feel old. Seeing how few get this line.
[deleted] t1_j24bjys wrote
[removed]
mminnoww t1_j21mtfp wrote
Dave?
The company is called Dave?
DragoneerFA t1_j21n6es wrote
The Republic of Dave
hotlavatube t1_j22sf22 wrote
Ah yes, run by President Daddy.
cloud_coder OP t1_j21nrjv wrote
ROFL-MAO Yes! Check this out https://investors.dave.com/
From the site. So much irony here...
Corporate Profile
Dave is on a mission to build products that level the financial playing field. The app launched in 2017 to help Americans avoid billions in overdraft fees charged by traditional banks. Now, Dave is a financial platform serving 10 million members with banking, financial insights, overdraft protection, building credit, and finding side hustles.
gnitiwrdrawkcab t1_j235mw7 wrote
10 million users with only 100 million between them?
KingStannis2020 t1_j23fdrx wrote
Market cap != Customer funds
NimChimspky t1_j23lgoy wrote
Or does it
[deleted] t1_j23hvhq wrote
[removed]
cloud_coder OP t1_j24z4hv wrote
Right but the delta seems extreme. At some point the book value of the reserves (do they hold reserves?) should be the floor on value
cloud_coder OP t1_j236zw9 wrote
Good catch. Classic MarCom.
Brock_Hard_Canuck t1_j23u2qp wrote
>Corporate Profile Dave is on a mission to build products that level the financial playing field. The app launched in 2017 to help Americans avoid billions in overdraft fees charged by traditional banks. Now, Dave is a financial platform serving 10 million members with banking, financial insights, overdraft protection, building credit, and finding side hustles.
This reminds me of that episode of Better Off Ted where Veronica and Ted have to give a presentation on some big "company project" (which doesn't actually exist) to investors and company execs, so they get up on stage, shout some meaningless buzzwords, have a bunch of smoke and flashing lights going, and do a bunch of silly dance moves, to distract everyone from the fact that they're actually saying nothing at all.
Bread_crumb_head t1_j24clj6 wrote
That show being cancelled so quickly was a tragedy. It struck a good balance in comedy and serious moments for a basically feel-good story about working in the most cynical corporate environment imaginable.
The ad spots were great too. Reminded me of Weyland-Yutani
rekniht01 t1_j240410 wrote
That show was hilarious.
cloud_coder OP t1_j24ggi9 wrote
Kinda like crypto. I mean the best example of a complete fraud is the Fozzle-Quark, which promised all the tangible benefits of ether in a totally anonymous package. Mining was performed by playing Asteroids or Pac-Man. To mint a coin (one side was Pac-Man the other Asteroids) you had to play equal time on both games and hit high score FROM THE SAME IP ADDRESS within 24 hours. Man that had legs. Soooo many people bought into it. I had 2 lambos in my sights on launch day.
[deleted] t1_j25mwhn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j21rfsl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j22z8vq wrote
[removed]
quequotion t1_j21ow1l wrote
We're going to have to add a whole new category of Daves.
[deleted] t1_j231uyl wrote
[removed]
Zawer t1_j23uwoj wrote
The first line of Dave.com is > Get up to $500 instantly
But the fine print says this is an instant loan that must be paid back. Pretty shady when it's common to see bank accounts and credit cards offering a few hundred dollars to switch
picklesthecat t1_j220056 wrote
I'm sorry Dave...
san_serifs t1_j23wo2a wrote
I wouldn't do that, Dave.
quequotion t1_j23yy8q wrote
Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
hotlavatube t1_j22s8nm wrote
"Dave's not here..." -- Chong
AStrangeStranger t1_j23u84l wrote
In UK there is a TV Channel called Dave
[deleted] t1_j21wjsl wrote
[removed]
gnitiwrdrawkcab t1_j235sod wrote
Over the summer he was called "The J.P. Morgan of Crypto" because of his supposed power and influence over the industry, so that ties perfectly into your statement.
[deleted] t1_j26e6p3 wrote
[removed]
thatfreshjive t1_j22ffa1 wrote
This is turning out to be a huge indictment of regulation, and the securities industry at large - Fuck this kid. How was no one aware of the undertable dealing until now?
cloud_coder OP t1_j234ww2 wrote
Well if the customers of FTX and other crypto exchanges bothered to read the news, or the disclosures when they signed up they would know that crypto is mostly unregulated. Crypto is not a security. "crypto" tokens are nothing but some numbers on a screen. If you want to trade greenbacks for fozzle-quarks, or moons, or Dogecoin then you can but it is your loss.
DonnieJuniorsEmails t1_j241wfc wrote
can i trade you some super valuable Trump Superhero NFTs for some fozzle-quarks??
cloud_coder OP t1_j24fp4k wrote
No way man, the fozzle-quarks are made of Unobtainium, bro. For those that are unfamiliar:
Fozzle-Quark, promised all the tangible benefits of ether in a totally anonymous package. Mining was performed by playing Asteroids or Pac-Man. To mint a coin (one side was Pac-Man the other Asteroids) you had to play equal time on both games and hit high score FROM THE SAME IP ADDRESS within 24 hours. Man that had legs. Soooo many people bought into it. I had 2 lambos in my sights on launch day.
DonnieJuniorsEmails t1_j26tokj wrote
nah. i have like 5 lambos. They're so common these days
myrddyna t1_j28mp5g wrote
I got 8 lambos in my pool. OP's got a dusty jacket, and soulless shoes.
GDLSCanadaOfficial t1_j28t6ow wrote
The issue isn't with crypto being a non backed asset.
The issue is that FTX stole customer deposits from their exchange and funneled them into their hedge funds (which then lost big time). Directly against their terms of service. And had zero collateral to back up these transfers.
SBF had a literal money making machine (fees from his exchange) and got greedy with it.
melkipersr t1_j23o1cn wrote
One of the selling points of crypto has been its unregulated nature. FTX was based in the Bahamas for a reason. All of FTX’s investors knew that they were investing in an unregulated space — that was a good thing, as far as they were concerned … until it wasn’t.
I don’t see it as a failure of regulation so much as a plea for it.
thatfreshjive t1_j261ik3 wrote
That sounds like a distinction without a difference - is there another way a regulatory agency pleas for help? Failure + capture are the plea.
[deleted] t1_j248874 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j24jxdj wrote
[removed]
Hedonisticbiped t1_j21rmqc wrote
They also used tokenized stocks to manipulate the stock market
[deleted] t1_j21wdxq wrote
[removed]
raymondcy t1_j23cvt3 wrote
In Nelson's Voice:
> Ha Ha.
[deleted] t1_j21sjk3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j21uewr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2202vi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j220wa5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j22gnmp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j22p3rc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j22t1j3 wrote
[removed]
surfe t1_j25qjys wrote
Amy Wu led FTX VENTURES. How did she deploy 5.2bn when its 2bn AUM?
cloud_coder OP t1_j27e0it wrote
Amy Wu Who?
surfe t1_j289ghx wrote
LiveLearnCoach t1_j23jic5 wrote
I’m just reading about this for the first time. Passed by the headlines before but wasn’t really interested.
What I do find funny, regardless of the crime is that this white-collar crime requires someone to be (apparently) handcuffed and manhandled.
(And for the record, I’m not belittling the crime, people should get punished for their crimes, I’m just amused by the procedure)
random125184 t1_j229b3y wrote
Remember. This guy isn’t being punished because he stole people’s money. He’s being punished because he stole the wrong people’s money.
Altruistic_Price7572 t1_j22ielh wrote
Um no.
This is the equivalent of taking the McDonald’s cash float to invest in selling whoppers as a side gig while working the till at McDonald’s.
It’s so blatant, obvious and stupid that it can’t not be prosecuted.
Him stealing the wrong money just means the it won’t be house arrest.
[deleted] t1_j22b0t2 wrote
[removed]
99Beers t1_j21zv2b wrote
This headline is a total puff piece to make SEC look good. It can easily be misinterpreted like the SEC was investigating FTX before the bankruptcy. They were not. Let’s be honest, not only did the SEC have no clue what was going on at FTX, the chairman of the SEC, Gary Gensler was meeting with SBF multiple times to regulate crypto in conditions favorable to FTX. And Alameda’s CEO father once worked with Gary Gensler. The whole thing stinks of corruption and the SEC is trying to wash it off.
I don't know what's going on with mainstream media. Back in November, they were on their hands and knees ready to suck-off SBF.
1dererLives t1_j223gty wrote
>This headline is a total puff piece to make SEC look good.
The idea that CNBC is conspiring with the SEC to give it positive coverage is some hilarious stuff. Conspiratorial speculation is fun!
quequotion t1_j233cuf wrote
Welcome to post-truth civilization. Reality is now whatever makes the biggest impact.
I hope whatever future civilization replaces us is unable to rectify ours
49thDipper t1_j234rga wrote
We are burning it all down. Any future civilization will be fighting over the last two sticks to rub together.
cloud_coder OP t1_j21jnn2 wrote
Uh oh. SBF is alledged to have diverted customer funds to invest in "Mysten Labs and fintech company Dave". $100m each.
Dave is publicly traded. Current price is 52 Week High $15, 52 Week Low $0.25. Soon to be even less if they claw back.