Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

taphead739 t1_j6r30la wrote

Now hold up with the sensationalism. They found an exoplanet with 1.0-1.2 Jupiter masses using microlensing, which is cool. But that‘s all the info they have on the planet. Calling this a near-identical twin of Jupiter is like saying “I weigh 80kg and I found out someone in another part of the world weighs 88kg - that must be my near-identical twin!“

21

PlaceboJesus t1_j6rsw11 wrote

Even some identical twins are more identical than others.
People are incredibly sloppy with language and tend to resist or reject any push towards precision.

While I agree that there's some hyperbole in that title, we probably don't agree as to what qualifies as sensational.

4

linkdude212 t1_j6sey8x wrote

Just wait until you read about "super-Earths" that aren't Earth-like at all.

>"New data shows that TOI-1075 b is one of the most massive super-Earths discovered so far," NASA officials wrote referring to the planet that orbits it's host star so closely that a year lasts 14.5 hours and temperatures reach 1,050C°.

3

brianfarina76 t1_j6sqw4g wrote

super earth just means rocky

2

linkdude212 t1_j6su204 wrote

Then they should use "terrestrial". Using "Earth" creates expectations in people's minds that are far beyond anything meant by "super-Earth" and leads to broad misunderstanding of the science. Look no further than the word "theory" for how damaging this can be.

2

grim_infp t1_j6qkh07 wrote

I don't think I've ever understood so few words while reading a paper.

9

Yodan t1_j6qu6ml wrote

"I know those words, but not in that order"

9

AutoModerator t1_j6qg0nx wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Lost-Branch804 t1_j6qqhmz wrote

Well, when you put it that way it makes perfect sense.

1

ahazred8vt t1_j6t70k9 wrote

4.4 au from its sun, about a 13 year orbit, it's 17000 light years away, and it doesn't quite transit the star as seen from Earth.

1