> Men included a higher degree of physical violence into their ideas while women favored ideas that reflected social aggression, though these effects were small and not statistically significant.

And yet this non-significant difference is used as an explanation for the EEG results. Poor science.

>Malevolent creativity, or using creativity in a way that is meant to harm others

Phrase caught my interest, makes sense as that's what it means

Trend level and not statistical significance.

"Maladaptive behavior can occur in members of either sex, but there are
often gender differences that arise. Research suggests that men are more
physically aggressive than women, while women prefer social and
relational aggression. Malevolent creativity, or using creative ideas to
lie, bully, blackmail, assault, defame, or play mean pranks on people
is linked to other maladaptive traits such as narcissism and
psychopathy."

​

So now researchers use the term "gender" to denote biological sex? Great, this is exactly what the trans lobby assured us would never happen.

There's nothing demonstrably "Maladaptive" about such behavior.

It's wretched, but plenty of adaptive behavior is wretched.

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

This is the second time I've seen "malevolent creativity" today and I've never heard that term before