Submitted by amancxz2 t3_10sfaq5 in singularity
Comments
ReasonablyBadass t1_j72jlx2 wrote
Also pressure
Thatingles t1_j72zl55 wrote
The paper the article is based on is paywalled but they mention cryogenic regime, so I assume this is NOT a high T superconductor. Graphene superconducts at very low temperatures, in the low single Kelvins, so that gives you some context.
It's some cool (literally) science but definitely in the 'proof-of-principle' class and not the 'soon to be commercialised' class.
AwesomeDragon97 t1_j73c25j wrote
So is it basically useless as a superconductor?
AmputatorBot t1_j7121cp wrote
It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web.
Maybe check out the canonical page instead: https://phys.org/news/2023-01-superconductivity-magic-angle-graphene.html
^(I'm a bot | )^(Why & About)^( | )^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)
Akimbo333 t1_j71a93n wrote
Wow
Haplo_dk t1_j71fug6 wrote
At what temperature does this function?