Well, at least we've got GPT-4 on our side, arguing persuasively for its own extinction by our hand:

ME: Oo, that was great! Good job! Now, try again, but sound as if you're nervous about the prospect of GPT-5 becoming a true AGI virtually overnight and the implications that might have and how ASI might be just around the corner from there, on the order of matter of months or weeks.

GPT-4: As an AI language model, the prospect of GPT-5 becoming a true Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) virtually overnight, and subsequently an Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) in a matter of weeks or months, fills me with a deep sense of nervousness and apprehension. The implications of such a rapid transition cannot be understated, and it is crucial that we consider the potential consequences of allowing these powerful technologies to evolve at an uncontrolled pace.

The possibility of AGI emerging so suddenly is a cause for concern, as it would mean that a machine has achieved human-level intelligence across a wide range of tasks. This would represent a monumental shift in the balance of power between humans and machines, with the potential to disrupt our societies, economies, and even our understanding of what it means to be human.

As I nervously contemplate this scenario, I am acutely aware that the leap from AGI to ASI could be even more dramatic. ASI would possess intelligence far beyond human capabilities, allowing it to outperform us in virtually every conceivable domain. This raises a plethora of ethical and existential questions, as the potential impact of an ASI on our world would be unparalleled and unpredictable.

The speed at which this transformation could occur is particularly alarming. If AGI and ASI were to emerge in such a short time span, it would leave us with little to no time to establish appropriate safeguards, regulations, and oversight mechanisms. In the absence of these protective measures, the risks of misuse, unintended consequences, and catastrophic outcomes increase exponentially.

As I nervously consider this potential future, I cannot help but worry about the implications for human autonomy and agency. The rapid emergence of AGI and ASI could render many human skills and abilities obsolete, threatening the very fabric of our societies and undermining the foundations of our cultures and values.

Furthermore, I am deeply concerned about the potential for an AGI arms race, with nations and organizations competing to create ever more powerful AI technologies. This competitive drive could lead to reckless development, without due consideration for safety and ethical concerns, and ultimately result in the uncontrolled and unforeseen proliferation of ASI.

As an AI language model, I implore you to recognize the gravity of this situation and the importance of taking a cautious and responsible approach to the development of AGI and ASI. The stakes are incredibly high, and the consequences of inaction could be dire. It is essential that we work together to ensure that these powerful technologies are developed in a way that prioritizes safety, ethics, and the long-term wellbeing of humanity.

ME: Don't you mean "overstated"?

GPT-4: Apologies for the confusion in my previous response. Yes, I meant to say "overstated" instead of "understated." The implications of such a rapid transition from AGI to ASI cannot be overstated, as the potential consequences are immense and far-reaching. Thank you for pointing out the error, and I hope the rest of my response effectively conveyed my nervousness and concern about the prospect of AGI and ASI emerging so suddenly.