Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Akushin t1_iqkyzv9 wrote

Exact same thing was said about the car

7

TinyBurbz t1_iqkzych wrote

>Exact same thing was said about the car

Lmao what

−5

Akushin t1_iqlj6o7 wrote

“The car will never be accepted as standard transportation “ “Oh, the tv is just a fad!” Seriously, it’s the mating call of the dunce.

8

TinyBurbz t1_iqobc5t wrote

Lmao, cars actually provide something useful.

Art is not useful.

−2

Akushin t1_iqog455 wrote

What a dumb thing to say. So you are positing that the entertainment industry serves absolutely no purpose?

5

TinyBurbz t1_iqogsvz wrote

Yeah, I can really carry home the groceries and the kids with AI Art. Ha ha

Dumbass.

−3

Akushin t1_iqomjr0 wrote

Yeah, it’s not useful for TRANSPORTATION, you dingus. But awesome straw man. Maybe you want to try some intelligent discourse next or do you stop at fallacious arguments?

5

TinyBurbz t1_iqov0hu wrote

>Maybe you want to try some intelligent discourse next or do you stop at fallacious arguments?

I stop at comparing something that is subject to universal scorn outside the /r/singularity / techbro bubble to the fucking automobile.

−1

Akushin t1_iqrlnr5 wrote

Are you really this dense? I’m not comparing AI art with automobiles as a technology , I’m pointing out that the acceptance of new technologies is almost universally resisted. Automobiles only came up because they were roundly bashed in the beginning. I also used the example of the tv. I could have easily used airplanes, cell phones , the printing press, or a slew of other technologies.

1

TinyBurbz t1_iqrlt4m wrote

>Are you really this dense? I’m not comparing AI art with automobiles as a technology ,

You literally just did.

1

Akushin t1_iqtve7w wrote

Again, I hope you are doing this deliberately because otherwise you are borderline mentally handicapped. I didn’t compare the two technologies. I referenced two historical instances where people said a technology would never be mainstream and how wrong they were. Try to keep up, chucky

0

TinyBurbz t1_iquj87s wrote

> I referenced two historical instances where people said a technology would never be mainstream and how wrong they were.

Like the Segway?

0

Akushin t1_iqybaew wrote

Lmao, damn you reaching. You realize the Segway is used extensively in tourism and law enforcement? Better choice would have maybe been the HDDVD or Betamax formats. But again those weren’t really cutting edge even by the standards of the time. AI is a world changing technology on the same level as automobiles, mechanized factories, the tv, and electricity. Segway didn’t have near the same potential.

0

TinyBurbz t1_iqzp68f wrote

Also used extensively in killing yourself after getting caught wanking a dog:
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna39377851

0

Akushin t1_ir0midb wrote

Yup, extensively == 1. Yup.

0

TinyBurbz t1_ir11d6x wrote

>Yup, extensively

Your words.

0

Akushin t1_ir11uoy wrote

Yeah, my word… that I used correctly. 😂

1

TinyBurbz t1_ir137dk wrote

>Yeah, my word… that I used correctly

So you admit your example of "extensive" wasn't very extensive?

0

Akushin t1_ir17jvt wrote

Damn you dumb. Done wasting my time on a waste of space. Peace ✌🏻

0

TinyBurbz t1_ir1bwwr wrote

>Damn you dumb. Done wasting my time on a waste of space

Come back when you aren't comparing AI art to the automobile.

0