Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

theonlyone38 t1_iybr6hc wrote

Everything is fine 🫠🫠

13

annualburner202209 t1_iyby9h0 wrote

Ok. Where to go from here? Signal?

10

aaOzymandias t1_iycywdf wrote

I guess Signal will be better alternative going forward.

2

[deleted] t1_iyc2ts4 wrote

[deleted]

0

CondescendingShitbag t1_iyc4s6n wrote

The article points out that it's unknown how the feds accessed the messages while noting the possibility someone who was party to the group may have provided direct access. This seems the most likely explaination given the circumstances and absent any credible evidence of actual compromise to the protocol. An accomplice looking for a lighter sentence (...or one who is simply incompetent) will almost always be the weaker link in secure communications.

5

annualburner202209 t1_iyc4y4z wrote

Damn. At least it was federal investigation and not some copyright bullshit, but still...

0

Indy_Pendant t1_iyd2eop wrote

💙 Signal

Can't share data if you don't collect data.

6

WackSparrow t1_iybt7iy wrote

They can scan over the 7 pictures of my certain area(I did instantly delete, I did it to leave my mark in there data stream.

2

Usagiboy7 t1_iyc0o8g wrote

Law enforcement can issue an order for internet companies, to not delete things like your history, emails, etc from their servers. So, even if you delete on your end, it's still stored on the servers, then handed over gift wrapped.

5

PlankOfWoood t1_iycgybd wrote

All someone has to do is replace all of their pictures with the canary watch website logo in order to troll the feds.

1

Upstairs-Wheel-8995 t1_iycghe2 wrote

So much for telegram. Shot themselves in the foot with this. Shouldn’t be collecting any data on anybody.

2

RejZoR t1_iycrcjp wrote

I don't understand people whining and shitting on Telegram. Telegram is not above the law. If courd orders it, they have to comply.

There is however difference when company complies and what they can comply with. Signal or ProtonMail can't provide much information beyond basic communication information like IP and timestamps of communication. And at least for ProtonMail I know they often dispute requests through Swiss courts unless it's clear that user behind it was malicious.

2

Daedelous2k t1_iydeetk wrote

All fine and dandy to take note but people associated it with security for themselves.

Now it's just another Whatsapp

3

RejZoR t1_iydftn2 wrote

That's not true. It is widely known for a long time that only parts of it were encrypted and others were not. People who need actual encryption use Signal.

3

Daedelous2k t1_iyde5xx wrote

This is where Telegram falls.

1