Submitted by mrnotadvice t3_121xma3 in wallstreetbets

Disclaimer: I have accounts at Schwab, AMP (futures), Fidelity, and ThinkorSwim (TD-soon to be Schwab). Schwab and TOS are fantastic. When I managed money I had ALL of my client accounts at their institutional division. While I wouldn't trust any of their "advisors" (different discussion for a different day) I most certainly have had a great experience.

IMPORTANT: I am focused on Schwab as a self clearing BD. Normally, a BD can go belly up, the Clearing firm cannot since its actually the Clearing firm that has custody of assets. A non-self clearing BD can go out of business and there would be no affect on client assets, other than being tied up for a week or so (I have been through this professionally) until the Clearing firm finds a new BD. The BD is the front end, the Clearing firm is the backend - with all the money. But Schwab is self clearing so failure of the BD is the same as failure of the Clearing part of Schwab.

While I am not overly concerned about Schwab, with their CDS news I got to wondering where the factual basis for my confidence is.

PREFACE: Schwab CEO stated Schwab "has enough liquidity in case all BANK deposits ran off." Ok, thats good to know.

BUT

soon after Bettinger said that a Schwab spokesperson said that Bettinger was "referring to client allocation decisions within Schwab and not clients pulling money from the institution and going elsewhere."

Well thats different. I think he was talking about reallocation of money out of money markets and cash and moving them into mutual funds, stocks etc. but still at Schwab- but the point is that he was not talking about money leaving the firm.

READING Further Bettinger said that Schwab "has around $100 billion in cash flow on hand and the means to raise more than $300 billion via FHLB and the Fed's new liquidity program set up after SVB."

Ok, so their backstop is cash flow (ok, not "money in the bank"), and tapping borrowing lines. I do not expect intrabank lending to freeze up like what happened in the GFC - BUT what the CEO is talking about is NOT what we here are talking about.

As of the end of 2022 Schwab had $7.48 trillion in total client assets.

OPINION: If, and that's a big IF, clients started yanking money out of Schwab Clearing, and assuming that Schwab could still rely on $100b in cash flow and the $300b from FHLB, that would "cover" 5.34% of total client assets.

If Schwab were to experience a large withdrawal of investment accounts, they would NOT be able to "cover" if those withdrawals were greater than their ability to tap credit lines. I have not researched what amount they have access to in terms of credit beyond what's listed above.

BULL VIEW: Schwab has plenty of money in FCF to cover their HTM expected losses. It just got $17b in inflows. It is NOT Lehman due to portfolio structure. AND, Schwab Bank does not make any business loans - almost all loans are mortgages and home refi's. Schwab BD and Schwab Clearing will be fine and any share weakness should be bought. Also, a huge part of Schwab Clearing assets are controlled by Investment firms, 401k's and advisors which normally means less volatility of deposits and withdrawals - they are "stickier."

BEAR VIEW: The bull view is valid ONLY under normal operating conditions. However, if another BD/Clearing firm of size (think Hilltop) were to experience large withdrawals, Schwab could be faced with the double problem of bad industry press and tightening credit conditions - which could cause their investment clients to flee. Furthermore, if the banking sector continues to get worse, which it will, credit conditions could tighten which would start a progression of decline which even Schwab could not handle.

MY CONCLUSION: Schwab will be fine. If they had more, and I mean a lot more non government agency bonds (Schwab is conservitive holding like 70% in Treasuries - so guarnteed by the Fed) then yes, the CDS jump would be a bigger deal. They don't. Also, it would take an epic amount of clients wiring funds out of their investment accounts to worry me. BC a lot of Schwab clearing accounts have financial advisors and funds as gate keepers, I doubt that would happen. For me, Schwab is #2 on my list of financial instituions I want to buy when more moneyline banks fail. I believe I will be able to enter long at a cheaper price within the next 5-6 months.

If you want a really really good analysis of Schwab, read this from one of our WSB members: https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/11p1mhl/do_not_bet_against_schwab_2023_credit_rating_a/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

That person is exponentially smarter than me.

28

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Dry-Volume-2189 t1_jdoavb3 wrote

Schwab disclosed that they are currently experiencing MASSIVE new money inflows, in excess of 2B per day of new money... and has been for over a month.

So, all that money running away from small and mid-size banks has to go somewhere. I guess a substantial amount of it is running over to Schwab and investing through them.

How do you think all these new investment customers will affect Schwab's bottom line and earnings in Q1? Anyone else see a huge earnings beat coming?

16

mrnotadvice OP t1_jdobugo wrote

In terms of direct revenues not much. However, remember every clearing firm can loan out and borrow against customers securities. With 7 trillion in customer assets even an inflow of 100b wouldn’t initially move earnings. The way I look at it is that Schwab just saved a shit ton in marketing and has tons of new clients to sell the rest of their products too. Down the road it should produce gains.

7

SocraticGoats t1_jdph75o wrote

If SCHW goes down we will have bigger problems tham SCHW going down.

12

MyPeePeeReversed t1_jdpvqxw wrote

This is true. Schwab has 1.7T assets under management AUM, while Morgan Stanley (Etrade) has 1.9T AUM. Both practically giants. If one goes down, you definitely have bigger issues too worry about.

7

mrnotadvice OP t1_jdr5uyr wrote

One difference is that Schwab does no investment banking. Morgan does. Makes Schwab “safer.”

2

Farnswirth t1_jdrfp06 wrote

> As of the end of 2022 Schwab had $7.48 trillion in total client assets.

According to OP

1

VisualMod t1_jdntjqy wrote

>I do not believe that Schwab will fail. They are a large and well-established financial institution. However, if another bank or clearing firm were to experience large withdrawals, it could put pressure on Schwab.

8

MyPeePeeReversed t1_jdpv5cr wrote

Hi OP,

You referenced my post. Cool thanx! I liked yours way better.

5

mrnotadvice OP t1_jdquxub wrote

Mine are Cliff notes (do they even exist any more?) - broad strokes. Yours is very detailed. Well thought out. Well presented. And -your username keeps making me laugh everytime I see it.

3

mrpizzatacular t1_jdp2ov0 wrote

If the investment clients were to flee, where would they really be able to go that is substantially safer than Schwab? Because if Schwab starts to have real problems then most others it’s size or bigger will likely be experiencing issues as well.

4

mrnotadvice OP t1_jdp96gt wrote

Exactly. Plus, it would take time for the ACAT process. The fastest I have ever seen was 1 week. Cash in an account can be wired out same day.

3

Wonderouswondr t1_jdpfddd wrote

Fidelity is the safest brokerage that I know of

1

thaginganinja t1_jdqwqp1 wrote

Yeah I have everything in fidelity. If they go down, we're gonna be fighting over cans of beans and it won't matter

1

Theta_Ome t1_jdr3bge wrote

Schwab bought think or swim for their retirement book.

The accounts they acquired padded against their risk assets exceptionally well by multiples.

I’m not worried about Schwab Or any other bank for that matter, least of all Schwab.

The doomers are astroturfers talking their apocalypse book.

2

jdmulloy t1_jdrbyyi wrote

I think BD Mena's broker dealer. It's rude to use acronyms without defining them.

1

indexedfun t1_jdtukoz wrote

I recommend working at Schwab. They have a decent corporate culture.

1