Submitted by Infamous_Sympathy_91 t3_z605qd in wallstreetbets
Comments
greatwhite5 t1_iy1lmu0 wrote
Good observation - this is also illustrating the business cycle. As the economy ebbs and flows, US sectors do better/worse. During periods of growth and expansion sectors like tech and consumer disc flourish while during times of downturn and recession, sectors like energy, materials and consumer staples see lower volatility (generally)
[deleted] t1_iy25j73 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iy1q00v wrote
[removed]
silent_silverfox t1_ixyqfdr wrote
Everything reverts to the mean. Period.
Very good chart! thanks for sharing!
Quality, Value and Dividend ETFs will probably be printing in the next couple of years as markets normalize from the shock-injection of money and low IR.
YoureAHunterGatherer t1_ixzu25q wrote
“Tech” and healthcare is pretty broad.
For example I still expect semiconductor ETFs like $SMH which have super robust moats to absolutely crush it the next couple years after being beaten down so low. There are only more IOT devices being made than ever before.
However things like airbnb, square, Meta etc may underperform and see much lower or maybe even negative growth
mk46gunner t1_iy03oao wrote
Anytime I see BofA mentioned, I can't seem to escape my near-Pavlovian response to think BofA deez nuts and chuckle, before resuming whatever it was that I was doing.
Nonbinary_Tea t1_ixz53uk wrote
Ta astrology would say that's a pretty big cup and handle ready to break bullish
option-9 t1_iy2zlzf wrote
That's not TA, that's LTT's morning drink.
Potato_Octopi t1_ixz6q0f wrote
Can't see energy and finance getting back to 36% of the index.
tomwesley4644 t1_ixzalq0 wrote
Ah yes the classic Crab Chart formation.
curious_geoff t1_ixzeg5v wrote
Energy sector has been rallying hard for well over a year. Debt free companies trading at 4x CF issuing special dividends… nearly all shale plays now in decline as demand peaks despite low economic activity in the heels of covid and remaining Chinese lock downs.
JollibeeNo1Customr69 t1_ixzqcbq wrote
Looks like a great chart for a Pairs Trade (eg long the lower sector, short the higher sector).
Infamous_Sympathy_91 OP t1_ixzzf18 wrote
Good call.
JollibeeNo1Customr69 t1_iy050rs wrote
Thanks! Just looked these tickers up on TradingView to compare them on an overlay chart, and unfortunately it doesn't look as clean as your graph though lol. I might need to tweek some things still.
eddie7000 t1_iy0lu70 wrote
As soon as the charts start to look pretty that's when you know the correlation is over.
Go for the ugly and you'll have a far better strike rate.
JollibeeNo1Customr69 t1_iy0mxnc wrote
Solid info. Thanks! Do you know a reliable tool or scanner by any chance where I may be able to scan for dollar-neutral pair instruments? Something similar to this picture from Wikipedia?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pairs_trade#/media/File:Pair_tool.JPG
eddie7000 t1_iy0o2xy wrote
Reliable scanner? Lol.
As soon as a scanner looks like it's reliable it stops working.
You're better off figuring out which kind of losing trades you can handle without going batty. ie Lots of tiny losses and one massive winner, etc...
JollibeeNo1Customr69 t1_iy0t5kx wrote
Maybe if you're looking at little intraday scalp trades on a noisy, unreliable minute chart, but Daily, and more so Weekly, Monthly and even Quarterly chart set ups are quite reliable. Not all of us are looking for quick, "gut instinct", lucky, minute by minute scalps and are quit content to wait and watch the longer time frames and calculate the Discounted Cash Flows for a given company. As for Pair Trading, it is considered a lower risk "arbitrage" strategy by Hedge Funds and used by them precisely for that reason, usually on a Daily chart.
VisualMod t1_ixyp27j wrote
User Report | |||
---|---|---|---|
Total Submissions | 0 | First Seen In WSB | 1 year ago |
Total Comments | 343 | Previous Best DD | |
Account Age | 1 year | [^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) | [^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) |
Vote Spam | Click to Vote | Vote Approve | Click to Vote |
^^WSB ^^Stats ^^Discord ^^BanBets ^^VoteBot ^^FAQ ^^Leaderboard ^^- ^Keep_VM_Alive
Goojus t1_ixz2atn wrote
Isn’t the financial industry still at an all time high though? I think clean energy can be a good thing cause investors might desperately flock to investing in it when the world’s at the brink of being on fire and governments pour money into it
Nonbinary_Tea t1_ixz5762 wrote
That's a slow falling knife for sure
Alatornio t1_ixz8pap wrote
This looks like the pictures my psychologist shows me.
CandyWalls t1_ixzabn6 wrote
BofA who?
shanks218 t1_ixzdnuy wrote
BofA deez nuts
Apprehensive-Ear-201 t1_ixzb7ym wrote
Things might work out well! So the next sitting president will have to deal with an abundant energy supply and a shit healthcare system on the verge of change… positive times coming!
SonicOnMeth t1_ixzxnao wrote
Well the graph says share as a % of the market cap, so more tech simply means tech companies represent more of the index than financial. Seing as tech is used more now than 10 years ago and will probably be used even more in the next 10 years.
Robincapitalists t1_iy0acq7 wrote
Think it would be worth separating energy to show exactly how small it is in market cap% of market.
kuedhel t1_iy1kk9y wrote
GS went up 25% in the past month. I think you are late on the "Financials' train.
captaindanco t1_iy1kw1q wrote
Is that a blue crab?
Extension_Ad_1347 t1_ixypeq0 wrote
Interesting.. but it feels like financials Are going to have a rough time in the near future 🤔
Infamous_Sympathy_91 OP t1_ixypsf2 wrote
With QT and rising IR, banks have more pricing power to profit from loans. A UK bank called Natwest, for example, is charging 5.49% on mortgages now, 2.49% above BOE 3%.
Extension_Ad_1347 t1_ixypye6 wrote
But arent people going to default on their mortgage If the price goes too high?
Infamous_Sympathy_91 OP t1_ixyrie3 wrote
Delicate balance the BOE is keeping to ensure house price stability for long enough so that if they default the bank can seek to repo their loans with enough equity in housing stock to get paid back fully. However, banks know many people will default as a last resort on their homes, so will dig into savings and cut back.
Buck_Folton t1_ixyrft1 wrote
They’ll burn that bridge when they come to it.
Obsidianram t1_ixyxwaj wrote
Banks have never been bailed out - ever...
VisualMod t1_ixyp2r6 wrote
This is an interesting chart. It shows the secular rotation from healthcare and tech stocks to energy and financials. This is a result of the increasing popularity of value investing strategies, which seek to find undervalued companies with strong fundamentals. Energy and financials are two sectors that have been historically undervalued relative to other sectors like healthcare and tech. As investors rotate into these sectors, we expect them to outperform in the coming years.
^^WSB ^^Stats ^^Discord ^^BanBets ^^VoteBot ^^FAQ ^^Leaderboard ^^- ^Keep_VM_Alive