Cool, now list a couple of modern major neuroscientists that believe in panpsychism nonsense. I'll wait.

Frankly, I don't give a fuck what Max Planck or Erwin Schroedinger think about an area that's extremely outside their domain. Erwin Schroedinger and Max Planck? Seriously? That's your fallacious appeal to authority? If you're going to use a fallacy, you could have at least used more compelling examples.

Roger Penrose is maybe one you could point to (still outside his domain), but pretty much all neuroscientists rightly call his quantum consciousness ideas non-scientific garbage. And that's barely on the spectrum of the pseudo-scientific panpsychism shit that you espouse.

Unfortunately for you, there aren't a whole lot of respected neuroscientists who believe in panpsychism. Panpsychism is an invention of philosophers with little grounding in science because they get hung-up on the made-up phenomenon of "qualia".

Qualia was made-up by people to feel special about themselves.

The idealistic paradigm is unverifiable woo-woo fucking nonsense.

I want to see this thing attached to a scaled-up GATO. Bring it on.

Qualia is something people made up to feel special about themselves.

Yeah just ignore what an intelligent AGI could do for resources from fusion just here on Earth, completely ignoring the vast resources in space.

This take is only logically valid if the AGI isn't goal-aligned with humanity (which is very, very possible).

Lots and lots of Star Wars, in multiple different timelines.