That's called being an ashhole, and I'm not an asshole.

I really enjoy citibike and feel like it's a good value for the money.

Seriously. Only ride from dock to dock.

So you don't think there is widespread election fraud taking place in New York?

So yes? You're claiming election results in New York are deliberately falsified?

Are you saying there is vast election fraud in New York?

The ballot box.

Thank you for saying this. There is a particular brand of internet apathy that insinuates that anything other than a silver bullet isn't worth pursuing, when in fact positive change is most often a long and incremental process.

Loads of online commenters believe that if something merely makes things better but not perfect, then it shouldn't be done. It's part of the lazy brand of contrarianism that's so popular these days.

Santos is the definition of a swamp creature. Fraud, conman, sketchy wealth appears out of thin air, etc. Lmao.

Nah, they didn't. They just had to turn out right wing voters, which they did. You stupidly assume that politics is zero sum, despite all evidence to the contrary.

>how did Dems lost

Setting aside the questionable English here, the answer is that right wing voters didn't care about the fraud, which Zimmerman and local news outlets had pointed out before the election. I know that's inconvenient to your narrative, though, so I'm sure you'll continue to disregard the role right wing voters and the Republican machine paid in facilitating this fraud.

Yeah, the person running a genuine and issue focused campaign was the problem, not the possibly criminal fraudster. Real hot take right there.

I fully expect someone pushing these kind of narratives to frame politicians as having "flocks" with quasi-religious devotion. Bet you feel really good about manufacturing things to get upset about instead of focusing on the actual fraud that took place.

Already rebutted this shabby narrative once: https://www.reddit.com/r/nyc/comments/zz6wv2/george_santos_story_broke_by_local_li_newspaper/j2brbgi?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3

Bunch of whiners.

Saying Zimmerman didn't campaign is objectively false. He was rallying with Schumer and other big names up until election day. These narratives miss the mark massively.

>heard zero ads

Yeah, nothing says "grassroots campaign" like running ad spots in a hyper expensive media market.

Again, Zimmerman pointed out that Santos was a fraud before the election. Republican voters didn't care.

Doesn't this district include part of queens?

Zimmerman pointed all of this out. He also ran a grassroots issue focused campaign. He did all the right things. The problem here is Republican voters who have no standards and no shame.

Not all traffic deaths are accidental. Many of them are caused by negligent or reckless driving that goes unpunished.

It's not, that's dishonest hyperbole. Your conclusion assumes that a (likely unenforceable) ban is the only policy approach available, which of course is wrong. There are other items being considered and, meanwhile, active outreach and education occurring, including: https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2022/consumer-alert-attorney-general-james-urges-new-yorkers-follow-e-bike-safety-tips

So before the accusation was:

>The folks on the left ignore all the risks of battery fires

And now its:

>It’s not a question of ignoring fire risks

So you've basically made my point for me.

The comment I replied to didn't say anything about upvotes, so again, I don't get your point.

If he wanted to complain about people not liking policies of their landlords, he could've done that without lying.