Lol they opened up their AI to be trained for free for "research purposes..." Sounds similar to how certain corporations greatly profited from recent current events over the passed couple of years... Wonder if they'll even go as far as calling people some kind of hero for helping them make a bigger profit >.>

If a corporation were trying to depreciate an open-source alternative to one of their projects, it might look like spreading negative propaganda about the open-source alternative or highlighting the perceived weaknesses of the alternative. For example:

FUD: The corporation may spread Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) about the open-source alternative, such as by suggesting that it is not secure, reliable, or compatible with other systems.

Highlighting perceived weaknesses: The corporation may highlight perceived weaknesses of the open-source alternative, such as by emphasizing areas where it falls short compared to the corporation's proprietary solution.

Undermining community support: The corporation may attempt to undermine community support for the open-source alternative by spreading misinformation about the project's development or suggesting that it lacks the necessary resources to succeed.

Offering alternative solutions: The corporation may offer alternative solutions that they claim are superior to the open-source alternative, such as by highlighting their own proprietary products or services.

Funding competitors: The corporation may fund competitors who are developing similar solutions to the open-source alternative, with the intention of creating negative publicity or drawing attention away from the alternative.

These tactics can be effective in diminishing support for the open-source alternative, but they can also be perceived as unethical and manipulative, potentially damaging the corporation's reputation and relationship with the open-source community.