No, because you are talking as if a character would have entire libraries of human behaviour. What I'm talking is way simpler. There would be digital characters built for specific movies and those specific movies would demand specific behaviors. If a character had to show sadness it would be fed with lots of information on how the human body is under sadness, how it walks, how it moves its head, how its lips move seconds before crying. If you cry because you are sad, it looks one way, if you see Tom Hanks crying, you are seeing someone acting as if henis sad. Obviously Tom Hanks is a greay actor and it can perform it with reasonable reliance, but it is still not close to perfection. If you have a digital character, all its facial movements would mive based of how human muscles move in real life when humans are sad, it would be a perfect representation of sadness, and way cheaper than casting Tom Hanks. Also not every actor is a Tom Hanks, but in the future, a technology like that could be applied at every face

It doesn't have anything to do with a digital psyche, it is just a prompt of movements based of human behavior

What exactly do you think I mentioned that is so far-fetched?

I'm not saying those future AIs are going to be sentient or have conscience. What I'm saying is that they could perform better than actual actors. An actor is obviously acting. The best actors out their can reach a state of mind with a blend of emotions where their own current emotions get mixed with the characters they are playing. With a digital version of a character you wouldn't have a blend of emotions, instead a simulation of the actual emotions, because they are made relying on pure human emotions. A cry of sadness would always be based on human pure sadness, and so on and on. It doesn't mean the AI would feel it, it would just perform it, and in a perfect way because it is empty of their own emotions

I'm not saying it can take the places of the most creative stances, only those who only follow orders. Every day AI technologies get cheaper while movie industry is one of the richest. I'm not saying that if you would put in it a lot of Tarantino movies you would have a Tarantino bot. What I am saying is that you could feed it with Harry Potter excerpts and it would create the most reliable Harry Potter face possible,way closer than Daniel Radcliff's. If you have technologies that simulate the movements of the human body you wouldn't need an actual human to act as Harry Potter, instead a digital Harry Potter. During fights agaisnt monsters he could be actually wounded without cutting scenes or VFX editions