Sorry by the way, I mistakenly thought it was an article summary and not something a user wrote. Also didn’t realize which sub I was in. It was rude of me to use that tone and language in my first comment, your opinion is as valid as mine is.

My point is the livelihood of CEOs are not threatened by AI, opposed to everyone else. To your point - they will use it as a tool. That’s my issue with people saying “oh it will replace CEOs” , because it won’t put them out of work, it’ll make them richer

That implies all CEOs own the company. And it also assumes they wouldn’t keep the title and add it as a new executive position with all authority and take all the credit.

I don’t think we’ll see a ceo replaced with an AI anytime soon. They’re the ones that make that decision, would you replace yourself with an AI??

Yep, sounds right to me. I’ve been an employed developer for 10+ years, I’ll have work in the near future, sure. But I see what’s coming. And it’s possible that timeline is shorter than I realize. The people that think it won’t impact them are fooling themselves.

One prediction that stuck with me is this. Rather than huge layoffs in a short amount of time, we’ll see a 2% workforce reduction each year moving forward, and it won’t bounce back. That’s the most likely estimate I’ve heard so far.

Very true. I’ve noticed lots of people use this argument for why their employment isn’t threatened anytime soon. I’m sure it’s true. Personally, I would find very little comfort in that being the foundation for job security.

This is so stupid it’s funny

Are you referring to putting ‘keywords’ in resumes? Because that whole thing is a myth to sell resume enhancement and review services, the applications that handle uploaded resumes don’t actually consider those.

Incest has been taboo for thousands of years primarily because it went against most culture’s purpose of marriage, which was the exchange of wealth / property. With incest, no wealth transfer occurs, so it was shunned by the general population. However, wealthy families / royals encouraged incest in order to keep the wealth in the family / not pass wealth to peasants.