mxjuno

mxjuno t1_j5o9qej wrote

Definitely heard of it. I haven’t had as much time as I like to respond to comments but the most efficient way to say this is that we have not been selecting for characteristics that will create conditions for more dangerous or difficult births in such a concentrated way.

We are selecting for babies and moms who will survive the process of gestation and birth, which has changed in a way more nuanced way (ie we have lost some ways of moving and feeding ourselves which create more dangerous birth conditions, and we have gained a lot of tools that have increased survival of pregnancy and birth). That won’t change the mortality rates of pregnancy and birth in a huge way within a few generations of c sections and other more modern interventions.

1

mxjuno t1_j5ky5qq wrote

I was actually going to include that caveat but I tried to keep it simple. There are so many generations of wisdom in midwifery, and I’m absolutely sure it has made a difference over the generations. I used midwives myself for my births. I wish I could find the article that refuted that our anatomy would’ve changed that much due to interventions that humans use and animals do not.

1

mxjuno t1_j0pbvu6 wrote

There’s a lot of data that supports it. I’m also a nurse with a master’s degree (so, extra research training!) and have seen it in the numbers and it’s glaringly obvious in real life. Anecdotally the people who are sedentary may not be dying but they are miserable af.

2