You know that doesn't track, and you're talking about a very select few games. Calling people mental for something they see value in is ludicrous.

Memory leak?

What do you mean we're paying more for less?

The game content has increased drastically and the prices have stayed the same for decades?

You don't think RDR2 is worth $70..?

And back then, they couldn't be updated. Once the game rolled out, that's what you got.

Exactly. Especially when the effort and content that goes into them nowadays is far, far more. Imagine Red Dead 2 back then? My mind would have imploded.

You don't have to buy them on release though. And a 40-50% jump in price is definitely not going to happen anytime soon.

It's easy to look back now and say that was a ridiculous price. At the time though, not so much. Nowadays people think games should cost $40 and get 100 hours out of it without DLC.

Brace yourself.

Games were $70 for far less content and development

Some of you weren't around in the 90s and it shows.

That's not how it works. Stop being lazy.

Yeah I can't cope reading that, way too disjointed. Punctuation please.