Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

HEBushido t1_it2ud8m wrote

This is awesome work! I love the idea behind it.

One critique, your magazine angle is a bit off on the gun. It's a bit too far forward..

Edit: I saw the reference, OP is correct

81

Top_Entertainer_760 OP t1_it2ygfi wrote

Hey thank you so much for your feedback. I should have used more references. I'll definitely try to be more precise when rendering real world objects going forward, cheers! 😀

57

HEBushido t1_it2zpd7 wrote

Yeah absolutely! I'm a bit of a gun nerd.

7

TheCaptNoname t1_it2wuee wrote

Would it be better if instead the artist went with a bolt-action abomination of an AK chambered in .308" Winchester?

18

HEBushido t1_it2xbrp wrote

No they could just have painted the mag correctly. No one is questioning what round the gun is chambered in. Art doesn't need to be that precise.

−24

clocks_ t1_it33l60 wrote

I think he was more taking a jab at the absolutely batshit homemade firarms that come out of Khyber Pass (like a bolt action ak chambered in .308) than critiquing op

41

dorkswerebiggerthen t1_it3ivi1 wrote

>Art doesn't need to be that precise.

Isn't this discussion about the magazine being 9 degrees off kilter?

21

HEBushido t1_it3k0sv wrote

Because that is very jarring. You can't notice that the bore might be too large. But you can notice when a magazine looks wildly off from the real gun. Especially when it's such a well known gun.

−2

crypto1092 t1_it4iv5m wrote

Why did you get downvoted for this? Lol. You gave your opinion

−1

HEBushido t1_it4jgux wrote

I don't have a problem with it. My opinion was ultimately wrong.

3

crypto1092 t1_it4kakm wrote

Yeah you’re not wrong on the first observation, and then you have the original photo which is a homemade magazine which you probably haven’t seen before. Probably would’ve helped if the reference was included somewhere beforehand

1

ImperialSympathizer t1_it3x1h6 wrote

I agree it looks weird but it actually matches the source pic as far as I can tell. Maybe the mag was so strange because it was custom?

13

tquast t1_it3sti1 wrote

The angle is actually correct it's just not as long as it should be, the original reference is a 50 round mag

5

HEBushido t1_it3v9ds wrote

Huh you may be right!

3

tquast t1_it3yjmv wrote

Anything other than a 30rd mag always looks kinda weird

2

HEBushido t1_it3yumg wrote

It looked extra weird here, but the original photo looks weird too.

2