Submitted by taylorhayward_boston t3_yk2c02 in CambridgeMA
taylorhayward_boston OP t1_iuqwdtw wrote
Reply to comment by KatinkaVonHamhof in Open Call for Mod Applications by taylorhayward_boston
That's an unlikely outcome.
deeply_concerned t1_iuqwy59 wrote
Resign. You made an ass of yourself.
taylorhayward_boston OP t1_iuqx9ha wrote
Thank you for your feedback.
matthewsmokes t1_iuqykt8 wrote
Don’t worry, I’m sure it will be reviewed in the coming weeks.
This guy sucks. I bet you love your mother-in-law.
KatinkaVonHamhof t1_iuqyvgr wrote
Why?
SheeEttin t1_iuqzxsf wrote
Because it's my fiefdom and I'll never give it up!
taylorhayward_boston OP t1_iur2s60 wrote
Because in life, not all people are going to agree with you on different topics. You don't give up and walk away when something doesn't work out, you learn and improve.
akanefive t1_iur5f9c wrote
It's not about a difference of opinion, it's about neglecting and then misusing the moderator tools. But it's all good man, enjoy ruling over the ghost town.
Elron-Cupboard t1_iur5uwy wrote
I bet he's going to dickishly thank you for your feedback.
akanefive t1_iur6p7j wrote
How much do I owe you?
taylorhayward_boston OP t1_iur5p5h wrote
Thank you for your feedback.
SheeEttin t1_iur7ie5 wrote
I don't see a whole lot of learning or improving here yet.
Walking away is also a valid option, especially if the community has made it clear they have no confidence in your moderation.
Better to die the hero than mod long enough to become the villain, but I suppose we're past that point.
taylorhayward_boston OP t1_iur7xzb wrote
The first step is to find additional moderators. Then we will work together to come up with the best approach to have a better sub.
Sometimes things take time. Rushing can cause problems.
KatinkaVonHamhof t1_iurbo68 wrote
You rushed to ban a broad, locally relevant topic, and then rushed to actively suppress feedback and conversation on the topic.
Your judgement regarding your previous actions and the path going forward is deeply skewed.
I'd suggest permanently closing this community, or handing the keys entirely over to someone with stronger communication, judgement and organizational skills.
SheeEttin t1_iur9cqs wrote
"Can" is not necessary, as we've seen your rush to judgment against bike posts is what caused this whole kerfuffle in the first place.
It's that you're either unwilling or unable to admit that you fucked up and apologize to the community that's got everyone pissed off. Instead we get non-responses like "thank you for your feedback".
taylorhayward_boston OP t1_iur03ll wrote
Because while my initial approach may have been heavy-handed, and perhaps misguided, the intent is sound - CambridgeMA shouldn't be a place where we contribute to the broad discord that's taking over the country where people are unhappy and antagonizing each other instead of working together to listen and solve problems.
[deleted] t1_iur41lq wrote
[deleted]
taylorhayward_boston OP t1_iur554c wrote
Thank you for your feedback.
akanefive t1_iurmvw8 wrote
>CambridgeMA shouldn't be a place where we contribute to the broad discord that's taking over the country where people are unhappy and antagonizing each other instead of working together to listen and solve problems
This is rich. If you really wanted to listen to people then you wouldn't have banned people and removed posts about a totally arbitrary rule based on an experience you had outside the sub. You made a rash decision and now you're trying to do damage control and you're making the sub all about you. You turned off the comments on the post where you announced the rule and you removed a post titled "Is the bike related post ban real?" THAT is the toxic behavior. People upset about getting banned or having their opinions stifled is not toxic. That's a reasonable thing to get upset about.
Lentamentalisk t1_iuteqk0 wrote
Wait wait wait. You banned everyone who said the b word because we should be "working together to listen and solve problems." Help me understand the logic there.
For christ sake I'm afraid to type out the b word for fear of retaliation! How is that "working together to listen and solve problems?" How can a community function when one side of a conversation wields ultimate power to silence all opposition?
defenestron t1_iurmt81 wrote
You need to go.
Not only have you failed at basic moderation for years, but then show up to abuse your power because someone spit in your face.
The fact you refuse to give up power after everything speaks to how completely unworthy you are of having power over others.
Since you utterly lack integrity and maturity, we can only hope the new moderators oust you so the community you’ve held back for years can thrive without you.
Eviljim t1_iuwl1tj wrote
Well bicycle to you sir.
Elron-Cupboard t1_iuwqbcm wrote
r/AgedLikeMilk
sneakpeekbot t1_iuwqcni wrote
Here's a sneak peek of /r/agedlikemilk using the top posts of the year!
#1: US Supreme Court justice promising to not overturn Roe v. Wade (abortion rights) during their appointment hearings. | 2786 comments
#2: … | 1631 comments
#3: Nice one Google | 956 comments
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^Contact ^^| ^^Info ^^| ^^Opt-out ^^| ^^GitHub
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments