I was mostly just rambling so sorry if any of my points werent clear or connected properlly. I do however agree with lots of what you said.... and onto more rambling by me......The town next door needs something like what you said. Right now they require 200ft of frontage 1.2ish acre min and has to have 6 frontage lots for every rear lot in subdivision. Dead end subdivsion culdesacs are limited to 10ISH maybe 12 houses... then the town makes the developer put a high% of each lot of a chunk of land into open space.. ie 40 acres has 10 , 2 acre lots and rest goes into conservation. Just ridiculous.. the only reason I can think of why they made it so restrictive was because a large part of it is a lake town that went through sprawl in the late 70s,80s, 90s and these regs were the solution to slow down development in early 00s which seems to of worked. But now P&Z is recognizing the negative effects and are looking to ease the regs, ie 150ft lot frontage instead 200.. or 15-20 house on culdesac vs 10/12. Still not enough though.