Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SamuraiPanda19 t1_iu0m5if wrote

Owning the libs by paying more taxes and getting mad at what used to be exit 6 becoming exit 12

−2

mkt853 t1_iu0o26v wrote

To be fair changing the numbers is kind of dumb at this point. No one is using the exit numbers to determine distances which was the original intent before people had GPSes in their pockets and cars when they started doing this in the '90s.

1

Malapple t1_iu4vy3t wrote

Scalability is much easier with the new model.

2

houle333 t1_iu11wty wrote

This is a good point. Numbers based on miles as a standard makes lots of sense in a world where people use paper maps to navigate somewhere new.

But fast forward to the 2020's and there might be 12 people under 60 years of age in the entire state that currently use paper maps.

Smart phone ubiquity and Google maps just straight up leap frogged us past a "future proof" standardization plan.

1

mkt853 t1_iu15axj wrote

Yeah remember when we had those yellow call boxes on the side of the highway every mile or so? At least with those they acknowledged that technology had rendered them obsolete so they were removed. At that point they should have shelved the exit renumbering plan for the same reason. CT likely won't be done with its renumbering until the 2030s. The state is probably hoping if they drag it out long enough the problem will just go away on its own.

1

nikedude t1_iu27qs5 wrote

Counterpoint, cars now tell you exactly how many miles to empty, so you can use this to determine if you need to stop for gas now, or when you get to your destination exit.

1

mkt853 t1_iu28bni wrote

I live in Connecticut. 90% of our exits are like 1 mile or less apart.

1

Nyrfan2017 t1_iu0xlfj wrote

Legit why if someone doesn’t agree with something it goes right to name calling ..

1