Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

CT_Patriot t1_iu83zao wrote

Reply to comment by AhbabaOooMaoMao in so who wants bet.... by AdHistorical7107

Oh no, guns... Oh wait, isn't there something about "arm" somewhere?

Let me see ..gee, I know I heard it from something important

Oh I got it...In the Constitution...the Second Amendment.

And the phrase "shall not be infringed" is in that Amendment.

Therefore, the Republican Senators of the State of Connecticut are asking the Governor of the state to follow the Constitutional law of the United States.

If it went to SCOTUS, the Republicans would win. See rulling on restrictive firearms laws in New York that were unconstitutional.

3

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu87mto wrote

Oh yea. Forgot your brain and dick so small you need a gun to make yourself feel better

2

CT_Patriot t1_iu87wdf wrote

Beats waiting for police to arrive. I will survive while you are dead.

5

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu8805y wrote

Keep telling yourself that....

2

CT_Patriot t1_iu884pg wrote

I do and sleep knowing I can defend myself and my family. Nothing wrong with that

You can wait for the police. Oh wait. .your party defunded them, so good luck.👍

5

AdHistorical7107 OP t1_iu88ftu wrote

Meanwhile the adults have to worry about the next school shooting. POS.

1

CT_Patriot t1_iu89s2r wrote

Yeah, everything is about some deranged idiot who somehow got their hands on a firearm. Maybe stop the establishment of drugging people with mental issues and find the root cause, lock up firearms from anyone who is unstable.

Next you'll be bitching about the fatalities caused by a car or truck.

Which, by the way are NOT a constitutional right, but a privilege.

4

bramletabercrombe t1_iu9jtpm wrote

I get the sense even a bear would be able to wrestle a gun away from you...

1

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_iu8wqur wrote

It must be so cool to read a document written 250 years ago with the mentality of a tiny baby who is oblivious to context or depth, without reading significant developments in 250 years of American jurisprudence.

Just as a narrowly tailored time place manner restrictions on government-owned property does not touch or offend the First Amendment, it does not concern the Second either. Not sure if you can understand that over the sound of your childish screeching.

2