WTF?

He's being helped...those heartless fucks need to be charged as well

What good is being on special parole when you can have five pending serious court cases and still be out of jail? Such a failure that he was even out of jail to be able to commit such a horrific crime.

Have to love the CT justice system. This guy was out on $375,000 bond with an ankle monitor and a rap sheet longer than a CVS receipt and should have still been locked up. How he had access to a baby given his past is even another mystery. I don't understand how this hasn't hit national news or how he hasn't been caught yet.

Edit: just realized the article neglected to mention that he also dismembered the baby that is his own daughter, which I think is important for the public to know and understand the danger surrounding this individual. If you go on the Naugatuck PD facebook page you can watch a press release with the information.

He must have been off parole when he got rearrested otherwise the parole would have been revoked.

If not, there's a judge that needs to be fired and probably some support staff too.

I bet they find this dude floating in the Quinipaic.

>Francisquini has prior convictions for assault, drug charges, interfering with an officer, violation of a protective order, threatening and criminal mischief.

This could be from a single incident where dude, like, went to his ex's house (violation of PO) and had some weed in his pocket (drug charge), got loud (mischief), and when the cops came he brushed up against one of them (assault) and told a lie (interfering).

This is not as impressive of a criminal record as it sounds.

Still, if he was on parole and got rearrested he should have been locked back up. That's a judge's job and you bet your ass the chief judge is looking into this.

Watch the Naugatuck PD press release video on their website. He is described as very well known to all law enforcement. You are only going to see some info on the judicial site, it's not the same as a background check. Here's a snippet below of some of his past.

"Francisquini is well-known in the state judicial system, with five pending cases in three different courts. He’s out on bonds that total $375,000 among the five cases, according to the Judicial Branch website. The previous charges Francisquini face are serious, including carjacking, second-degree assault and third-degree robbery in West Haven; burglary in Derby and assault on a police officer by state police at Troop G in Bridgeport."

That adds some beef to the sandwich for sure.

Well he strangled, stabbed, then dismembered his own 11 month daughter. A person doesn't get like that overnight, so he obviously would have exhibited some indications to professionals had he been properly evaluated by the courts in the past cases.

From what I read, he had been on parole and violated it so he finished his initial sentence. He was on the hook for more charges but it was caught up in court which is why he was out on bail with an ankle monitor. Sadly, this could have been prevented if our legal system wasn’t so clogged with frivolous lawsuits from bored inmates wanting an extra mattress or brand name Lubriderm because of reasons.

Wow did the courts hire clairvoyants or something?

Psych evaluations can tell a lot to a professional and should be mandatory for parole with violent offenders.

I don't get why you are excusing someone like this and the failure of the justice system. A violent offender shouldn't have been out and having the care of an infant.

That's plausible.

What an absolute sick fuck.

Ehh. Our courts are pretty efficient at wading through the bullshit. Ten years ago I may have agreed.

I remember the first time I heard an OCPA litigant in a criminal court like twenty years ago. You have to realize, these litigants are victims of a mail order scam.

See pages 127 to 134 for judicially responding to such litigants. The whole thing is a great read if you want to know all there is to know about it.

Are you a corrections officer or know one that was sued or something, that you hold this view? I think you're grossly overstating the problem.

https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.html

Individual litigants simply don't have the personal resources to waste significant judicial resources. The resources actually get wasted by corporate defendants who view the aggressive defense of legitimate claims as the built-in cost of doing business. These litigants actually have the competence and resources--practically unlimited funds and armies of white shoe lawyers--to use significant court time, as well as the opposing party's time.

Like, the number of inmate trials about mattress quality that make it to jury selection is zero. On the other hand the number of clear liability, clear damages claims for car accidents, slip and falls, professional negligence, consumer protection, workers' comp., and products liability, actually exists and is a significant drain on judicial and legal resources. They will spend two commas to save one, three to save two; it's to set an example to other would-be challengers: do not sue the corporate class, even if you win, you'll lose. Want to be mad, be mad at that.