Submitted by poliscijunki t3_z0lbp9 in Connecticut
Uharugger t1_ix9gxml wrote
Reply to comment by Barrayaran in Democrat Chris Poulos Won His Connecticut House Race by a Single Vote by poliscijunki
Fiscally conservative in this context is just trimming excess where necessary. Making sure funds aren't misappropriated and then distributing them where needed. An example would be, under the old selectmen, the new high school greenhouse (at the time) was allotted $300,000. The person running it said they only needed $100,000 but the school was still given the $300,000. The other $200,000 was no where to be found. This was years ago but that was the kind of bs going on in town for years. The current selectman, who is a democrat, could be considered fiscally conservative. He's great about making sure projects are appropriately managed from a money stand point. Which allows for more funding for social programs, infrastructure projects etc.
giant_toad42 t1_ix9nu25 wrote
There is nothing wrong with reallocating money to do maximum good.
Where we deviate from fiscal conservatism - is when the greenhouse is allocated $300k, but only needs $100k - and the director of the greenhouse replaces the windows every year to make sure that the excess $200k is retained in budget.
The additional $200k could have been saved as surplus or reallocated to different programs. I'd prefer it were saved as surplus for when economic downturn hits .. so cuts are not necessary.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments