Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Justagreewithme t1_j5r3qyv wrote

I have no issues with this, as long as it’s for persons 18+

−20

EarthExile t1_j5t0qas wrote

As long as the people who need it the most are still screwed over, it's good?

3

Justagreewithme t1_j5t58ss wrote

No, quite the opposite really.

−4

EarthExile t1_j5t9xxe wrote

Walk me through it. Why must the people who most direly need to avoid an unplanned pregnancy, and are more likely to make risky decisions, be kept from birth control?

3

Justagreewithme t1_j5tb1sm wrote

They shouldn’t, but they should be seeing a doctor before taking it.

−2

IamRule34 t1_j5tncli wrote

But why? A pharmacist is more than qualified to provide the necessary information to start birth control. In many ways probably more qualified than a typical family practitioner, given they'll typically have a better understanding of how the drugs work.

1

Justagreewithme t1_j5v5bs4 wrote

Then why have doctors at all?

1

IamRule34 t1_j5vawj5 wrote

Because pharmacist specialize in drugs and their interactions, they don’t specialize in being a practicing doctor. It’s not a black and white thing.

3

Justagreewithme t1_j5vy7pd wrote

Right, which is why a pharmacist shouldn’t be prescribing things to a patient that hasn’t been assessed by a doctor. Pharmacists don’t have access to medical history beyond what you’ve been prescribed previously, and often times not even that. IF the drug is so harmless that it can be dispensed to a minor upon request without examination, it should not be prescription based at all. It should be over the counter.

0