Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

OwlBeneficial2743 t1_j4hes8j wrote

I believe that others used one or more of the zero days in subsequent malware; Flame was one. I don’t think it’s been proven Flame wouldn’t exist without Stuxnet, but it’s likely.

5

CupResponsible797 t1_j4hgmur wrote

Flame was developed by people involved in developing Stuxnet, no surprise that they would share elements. There's little indication that Flame is "subsequent malware", everything we know indicates that they were developed at around the same time.

Stuxnet development started around 2005

Flame development started at least as early as 2006

In fact, there are strong indicators that the people who developed Flame provided guidance and technical assistance to the less sophisticated Stuxnet developers. It's difficult to imagine that the development of Flame would have hinged on Stuxnet in any way.

>I believe that others used one or more of the zero days in subsequent malware;

Such as?

9