Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Haiku_Time_Again t1_j89fjzd wrote

3

solarsuitedbastard t1_j89jsi2 wrote

Sorry but what is the point you’re trying to make by the increased variety then, if not the more diverse nutritional component?

−1

Haiku_Time_Again t1_j89mcbj wrote

Are you serious?

Poster says we have far less diversity and choice in our diets, and we can only find twenty vegetables at the store to buy.

I said that is far, far more variety than ancient people had.

Why is this difficult for you?

1

solarsuitedbastard t1_j8ad5w8 wrote

I am serious. Variety is but a slice of the nutritional pie. Eating wheat 2000 years ago was vastly different in nutritional value than the wheat we consume today.

I agree with you that there is more variety. The issue I’m trying to point out is even if you are comparing “apples to apples” an ancient apple had a different nutritional value than a modern apple.

My apologies if my difficulty understanding your narrow point caused you strife today. Take care

1