Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

GeoffreyArnold t1_j8yub6u wrote

Meanwhile, Jeffrey Epstein's client list is still hidden. This isn't anything new and Cory Feldman is not the most egregious example of protecting pedophiles who happen to be powerful. Two mega donors to the Democrat party from Atlanta were caught molesting and having sex with their adopted children and Reddit censored the story under the guise of "hate speech" (because the pedophiles were gay married to each other). This happens all of the time.

−93

timshel42 t1_j8ywd71 wrote

citation needed

30

FSMFan_2pt0 t1_j8yzpvv wrote

Don't count on it. Notice he calls out "Democrat party". (despite there being loads of Republicans on Epstein's list, including Trump). Look at his comment history. He posts in /r/conservative and /r/conspiracy a lot. Anti-Biden comments, etc, just another right-wing conspiracy nut.

81

timshel42 t1_j8zl76w wrote

if only you had included a breitbart article it would have really sealed the deal

31

Nooddjob_ t1_j8ziesi wrote

All those sources are garbage, I don’t really believe mainstream media.

3

GeoffreyArnold t1_j8zpgr5 wrote

Sources? This is a fucking court case. The NY Post has the actual public documents from the case.

11

ZeerVreemd t1_j90qdp6 wrote

Some people do not understand the difference between a source and a medium. Somehow it are always seem to be the same people who believe all mainstream narratives, LOL.

2

Nooddjob_ t1_j8zuv8j wrote

NY Post is just mainstream media trash.

−2

DukeVerde t1_j8yvbph wrote

Don't think I've heard that story yet, by any outlet...

29

hearke t1_j8z29vq wrote

That's cause the mainstream media are hiding it, which means you know it must be true.

Source: I don't have any sources, so it must be true

44

DukeVerde t1_j8zd2ag wrote

But it was on reddit, so it must have existed; once upon a time!

12

anyavailablebane t1_j8zdmdz wrote

this was the first thing that popped up in google. I remember reading about it recently. It wasn’t widely covered but was definitely covered in Australia where I live.

6

[deleted] t1_j8zb7m3 wrote

[deleted]

−4

Crasz t1_j8zi2ap wrote

The 'Daily Mail'? You mean like the UK version of The National Enquirer?

14

Crasz t1_j8zi668 wrote

Hmm, all three of those sources are questionable though...

24

zedzag t1_j8zyfjw wrote

Where does it say they're mega donors of the democratic party?

17

Odeeum t1_j91gggi wrote

They don't. They're just regular, awful people...but he wanted desperately to associate this with Dems somehow.

2

AngelSucked t1_j9100uv wrote

The DM, Fox, and the NYP are yiur sources?!

Lolololol

3

UsecMyNuts t1_j8yy1yh wrote

To be honest I think there’s a huge difference between that and what Corey Feldman is doing

Feldman isn’t protecting anyone or fearing for his life, he’s outright lying that his friend (who just so happens to be dead and cannot defend himself) was brutally raped by a “Hollywood exec” and has changed his story multiple times to the point where the only person who could have possibly raped Haim or Feldman was a relative of Haims.

He’s bullshitting to make money.

23

GeoffreyArnold t1_j8zgo1t wrote

> Feldman isn’t protecting anyone or fearing for his life,

Wait what? You talking about the couple who raped their adopted children in Atlanta or are you talking about reddit? Or are you talking about Epstein?

−14

UsecMyNuts t1_j8zlm06 wrote

I’m talking about Corey Feldman lying about his (dead) friend Corey Haim being raped as a child.

10

PretendsHesPissed t1_j8zlb2n wrote

I want in assuming you're a far right moron ... I came out realizing you're even worse than I thought.

Such a strange thing how the uneducated will do nothing to properly educate themselves yet to think they can speak with some authority.

Also, WTF is "gay married to each other"? Don't you mean butt buddies or something?

11

GeoffreyArnold t1_j8zp9c3 wrote

> Also, WTF is "gay married to each other"? Don't you mean butt buddies or something?

Did you read the articles? Two men. Married to each other. Large donors to the Democrat Party. Adopted children to rape and sell them to other men.

−2

YaaBlewIt t1_j90dljg wrote

None of the three articles you linked mention the Democratic Party or donations at all. Just that they were active in the local LGBTQ community. Even so, how is their party affiliation or political ideology or sexual orientation of any relevance to their fucking evil, heinous criminal actions? i.e. raping their kids and offering them to other pedophiles to rape. I think anyone claiming those things are in any way related requires immense ignorance and/or hate. Would you mention it if a rapist was a large donor to the Republican or Green Party? Or if they were straight married?

11

EvilioMTE t1_j908oyq wrote

Im not quite sure why you're so hell bent on turning paedephilia and rape into a Republican/democrats issue. The world is far bigger than that.

10

AngelSucked t1_j910jw3 wrote

You didn't answer: how is "gay marriage" different than "marriage"?

5

GeoffreyArnold t1_j91mcri wrote

"gay" because it would be misleading to imply that a man and woman raped and sold their children to a pack of pedophiles. Without knowing that these are two men, you wouldn't understand why reddit would censor the story. If it were a married man and woman doing this, reddit wouldn't care that people heard about it.

0

AngelSucked t1_j920lx8 wrote

You didn't answer me: What is gay marriage? I can't find it in any Federal, state, or local laws or codes.

1

Odeeum t1_j91gwum wrote

There is zero mention of them being "mega-donors" to any party on those articles

1

Odeeum t1_j91g8gw wrote

The sources you posted, while objectively awful, fail to mention anything about them being "mega-donors" to the Dem party. They're pretty low level scumbags molesting their kids, which unfortunately happens.

When you embellish things with stories like this it does a disservice.

3

ammshrimpus t1_j91s1db wrote

The flight logs are out now. You would be surprised at who flew on Epsteins “Lolita express”. Some of the celebrities I would never have guessed but Hollywood is an interesting bunch.

2

GeoffreyArnold t1_j929ome wrote

But the flight logs and the client list are different things. What they are hiding is the client list. Epstein and Maxwell were charged with essentially pimping underage girls, but who did they pimp them out to? That list of clients of powerful people is a secret to this day. We know there was one member of the British Royal Family but where are the rest of the names?

The flight logs just says who was on his jet. That doesn't mean they had sex with any of the minors. What we want to see is the client list.

3

ammshrimpus t1_j92gdma wrote

I agree. Too many disgusting child sex offenders are being protected. They should all be prosecuted. I’m betting the reason the client list is still hidden is because there are some very influential and high powered people on it.

2

GeoffreyArnold t1_j92svpk wrote

That’s certainly the reason it hasn’t been released. Meanwhile, “look over there….it’s a spy balloon!”

3