serks83 t1_iu5l4wh wrote
I give you this much; it’s a beautiful shot. But there’s nothing remotely moon-like about that landscape.
ABSOLUTELY everything that looks great there is the by-product of either weather or water based erosion. The moon does not and has not ever had either of those.
You could have said Mars-like or Martian and it would have been fine. Or even alien landscape. Other-worldly. Non terrestrial. Extraterrestrial. Unearthly. Sci Fi landscape.
I know it’s a bit anal to point out, but you had so many other options…and you picked the most ill fitting one…
Anyway…nice picture…
holy-shot OP t1_iu5mysq wrote
Well, according to the name of the viewpoint (moon overlook) and the color of the rocks / sand, especially at dusk or dawn, I though it‘d fit quite well. But I get your point.
serks83 t1_iu5ttb5 wrote
The viewpoint itself is called moon overlook?! Then the discrepancy is less with you and more with those who named the viewpoint.
I rescind my critique. Still don’t like the comparison; but I’ll probably get over it, at some point in the distant future. /s
I’ll say again though (as it bears repeating); beautiful picture.
holy-shot OP t1_iu5vu6r wrote
serks83 t1_iu5yt77 wrote
Really is a beautiful landscape. Lovely shots! Appreciate your work, my dude!
ontopofyourmom t1_iu68apd wrote
It is definitely a otherworldly landscape, just a different "other world."
Nobody actually knew what the surface of the moon looked like before the 60s, and it wouldn't surprise me if the viewpoint was named before then.
[deleted] t1_iu5vlma wrote
[deleted]
SlendyBenJ t1_iu744wo wrote
Yeah, it doesn't matter at all. Beautiful photo!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments