Submitted by Atienon44 t3_126frzo in Futurology
FeloniousReverend t1_jebd0gv wrote
Reply to comment by FreeQ in The age of average - Is the world becoming an echo chamber ? by Atienon44
Yeah, and that's what people are choosing to eat. Maybe it's where I live in the PNW and in a foodie area, but monthly I eat elk or bison, and at least a half dozen types fish and seafood, that's without getting into all the imported foods ands flavors from other countries. My point is that people have access to a more diverse amount of food than ever before in history, they just choose not to eat it.
Fire__Marshall__Bill t1_jeblwzb wrote
> they just choose not to eat it
I do get your sentiment but consider that for a lot of people it's not choice, they simply can't afford those more expensive foods.
For example bison meat where I live is about $10USD per lb. If you're trying to feed a family of 4 on a budget, ground beef at less than half that price looks a lot better.
FeloniousReverend t1_jebnbje wrote
But the whole argument requires picking and choosing your stance, so you're choosing to base it off an average family or four in the US as opposed to a generic "hunter-gatherer of North America," apparently from the north/northwestern region. There were periods long before they could hunt large game, and there are groups today, such as the Inuit, that have extremely limited traditional diets in regard to biodiversity if you don't include the influx of modern foods.
I'm just taking exception to the often-stated but not well-defined stance that hunter-gatherers of specific yet undetermined locations and time periods had such impressively diverse diets compared to modern times.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments