Submitted by MINE_exchange t3_126lfjd in Futurology
Particular-Way-8669 t1_jebcdng wrote
Reply to comment by khamelean in Google Accused of Using ChatGPT Algorithms in Creating Its Neural Network by MINE_exchange
There is difference between human that can be creative and using it for computer program that creates aggregations. Completely different thing. AI does not really learn. It adjusts its mathematical functions based on data.
khamelean t1_jebgej7 wrote
No, there is no difference. Creativity is just combination and random mutation. It’s how humans are creative, it’s how machines are creative. It’s the same thing.
Particular-Way-8669 t1_jebh4n3 wrote
This is utter bullshit. There was always some human that came up with something first. When there was nothing like that before. AI technology we know does not have this ability. And never will. It is only data aggregation, nothing else. Human does not need data from other humans to be creative and the very fact that there was someone who climbed off of trees and picked up first fire is proof of that.
khamelean t1_jebi03n wrote
Combination + mutation. It allowed evolution through natural selection to give us every life form on earth. Creativity works exactly the same way.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments