> when these “environments” don’t suggest it

These what

Also no, nuclear is not the solution, I don't know how often this has to be pointed out. Nuclear is too slow, to expensive and not even scalable:

https://phys.org/news/2011-05-nuclear-power-world-energy.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-energy-nuclearpower-idUSKBN1W909J

https://spectator.clingendael.org/en/publication/nuclear-energy-too-costly-and-too-late

https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/nuclear-power-still-not-viable-without-subsidies

while renewables are pretty much the opposite on every one of these points. The nuclear industry - like the fossil fuel lobby - is part of the problem, not part of the solution.