Submitted by tshirtguy2000 t3_121ol6g in Futurology
SomeoneSomewhere1984 t1_jdmu6sa wrote
Reply to comment by MistyDev in Who do you think will be the winners and losers of the coming AI revolution? by tshirtguy2000
Telling the truth, instead letting people indulge in naive optimism, adds something of value. Once humans are no longer needed because the people with power have machines to do everything for them, they'll leave the rest of us to starve in the streets.
Too many worship billionaires and hate their fellow humans (especially those of another color, religion, sexuality, etc.) to try to do anything to stop it. The hateful morons will stop any attempts to organize to make post-AI capitalism non-genocidal because they'd rather see others suffer, then not suffer themselves.
peadith t1_jdmurx1 wrote
I agree with what you say about celebrity billionaireism but it's already starting to look like billionaires are going to find out first about how much they're really worth and the followers will have to find something more significant to worship.
Assembly_R3quired t1_jdmvhaa wrote
How does this comment add value to your prior comment? I still don't understand after reading why billionaires are going to win because of AI.
SomeoneSomewhere1984 t1_jdmw0rn wrote
The reason capitalism works now is that billionaires need workers, so they pay people to work, and those people use the money for things they need.
When they don't need workers anymore, because they can use AI, the vast majority of humans won't have a way to contribute to society well enough to earn a living.
[deleted] t1_jdn1f0r wrote
[deleted]
SomeoneSomewhere1984 t1_jdn9055 wrote
They don't think this far ahead.
[deleted] t1_jdnl2k1 wrote
[removed]
Assembly_R3quired t1_jdmyejm wrote
Ah yes, just like how the average quality of life dropped when the plow was invented.
Or how the average quality of life dropped when electricity was discovered.
Or how the average quality of life dropped when assembly lines were automated.
SomeoneSomewhere1984 t1_jdn8thv wrote
I don't think you understand the difference. Those things still required humans to run them. Now we're talking a technology that can do everything humans can do.
Assembly_R3quired t1_jdrwdii wrote
That's cute, but ultimately, all of the above directly caused the destruction of millions of jobs. You can make up any qualifiers you want, but the truth is what it is.
Used-Comment-5003 t1_jdv0e2k wrote
How do you think humans will make money if AI takes all the jobs?
Assembly_R3quired t1_jdy6seb wrote
Wrong question. Do you think Uber would exist today if we relied on horses for transportation?
Jobs are created even when their isn't direct need of them, and assuming you can guess what those will be is what you're doing when you say humans won't be able to find employment.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments