Helkafen1 t1_jebp0ah wrote
Reply to comment by marcusaurelius_phd in The European Union to nearly double the share of renewables in the 27-nation bloc's energy consumption by 2030 amid efforts to become carbon neutral and ditch Russian fossil fuels. by chrisdh79
Europe has already enacted policies to support green hydrogen. It's not just a plan. The Inflation Reduction Act in the US does the same.
It's also important to remember that we can reach a ~90% renewable energy system without these fuels. We don't need them immediately. We'll need them mostly in the 2030s and 2040s.
> Nuclear works now.
Does it, though? The three recent European nuclear projects (Flammanville, Hinkley Point C, Olkiluoto 3) are all financial disasters plagued with massive delays.
Strong agreement about keeping existing nuclear plants online.
Edit: grammar
[deleted] t1_jebqlrh wrote
[deleted]
marcusaurelius_phd t1_jebth4e wrote
> Europe has already enacted policies to support green hydrogen. It's not just a plan
Green hydrogen does not exist at this time. Therefore, it's just a plan.
> Does it, though? The three recent European nuclear projects (Flammanville, Hinkley Point C, Olkiluoto 3) are all financial disasters plagued with massive delay
There's about 100 GW of already installed capacity. That's 100 GW more capacity on windless winter days than non-hydro renewables.
Helkafen1 t1_jebu4dy wrote
> Green hydrogen does not exist at this time. Therefore, it's just a plan.
Google is your friend. Took me 1 minute.
- U.S. Hydrogen Electrolyzer Locations and Capacity
- Total installed electrolysis capacity by technology
> There's about 100 GW of already installed capacity. That's 100 GW more capacity on windless winter days than non-hydro renewables.
So? That doesn't make nuclear energy competitive for new projects.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments